Hi all,
IMHO and FWIW the corrected text proposed in this Erratum is technically
incorrect, and. Therefore, the Erratum must be rejected.
Ethernet Segment (EVPN Type 4) routes are used solely for discovery of all PEs
that participate in the process of election of the Designated Forwarder (DF)fo
Pavel,
Lots of thanks for your email.
Looks as we are aligned😊. I am not sure if the reporter of an Erratum can
revoke it (never tried this).
Regards,
Sasha
From: Pavel Mykhailyk
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 12:33 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein
Cc: RFC Errata System ; rtg-...@ietf.org;
bess
Sasha,
Andrew will take care of it.
Cheers,
Andy
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:37 AM Alexander Vainshtein <
alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com> wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> Lots of thanks for your email.
>
> Looks as we are aligned😊. I am not sure if the reporter of an Erratum
> can revoke it (never tried this)
Andy,
Lots of thanks for a prompt response.
There seems to be a consensus about the disposition of this Erratum, so I do
not expect any problems.
Regards,
Sasha
From: Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 3:04 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein
Cc: Pavel Mykhailyk ; RFC Errata System
; rt
FYI - I deleted this errata report at the request of the submitter.
Thank you,
RFC Editor/rv
> On Jan 11, 2024, at 5:04 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>
> Sasha,
>
> Andrew will take care of it.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:37 AM Alexander Vainshtein
> wrote:
> Pavel,
