Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source-07.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the
IETF.
Title: Multicast Source Redundancy in EVPN Networks
Authors: Jorge Rabadan
Jayant Kotalwar
Senthil Sathappan
Hi Sasha,
About your questions:
1. Yes, DGW1/DGW2 could use the RD of the IP-VRF if they advertise a prefix
for H1. Note that the DGW could also genera a default route, etc.
2. DGW1 and DGW2 decide if they advertise host routes for those hosts in IP
Prefix routes, or local subnets, etc.
Hi Sasha,
In your case, the route type 5 would use the RD of the IP-VRF. I don’t think
any implementation would do anything different.
RFC9136 says the RD has to be used in the same way it is defined in RFC7432,
but the text refers to the recommendation of using a type 1 RD and its
uniqueness,