Hello All,
Resending, as I didn’t see any response on the following query:
In section 3.2 of the draft: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-08 the “Default
Flexible Xconnect” is described.
Section 3.2 defines the single homing case, while section 3.2.1 describes the
multihoming case.
Is it allowed
As co-author, I support the WG adoption of this document.
Not aware of any relevant IPR.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Date: Monday, November 13, 2023 at 3:51 AM
To: 'BESS'
Cc: 'bess-cha...@ietf.org' ,
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-alias...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption and IPR po
Support, not aware of any IPR
On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 05:13:04 AM PST, Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
wrote:
As co-author, I support the WG adoption of this document.
Not aware of any relevant IPR.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Date: Monday, November
Support as a co-author and not aware of any IPR
Kind Regards
-Lukas
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 6:50 AM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
> draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-09
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
