Hello,
I reviewed draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02. I consider that this I-D is ready
for endorsement by the BESS WG.
Many Thanks,
-- Brd
From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:49 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject
Hi Luc,
Theirs is another way of achieving the same thing - using the behavior vs.
using the flag.
The draft link:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-bess-multihome-srv6-service-sid-flag/
Each egress PE advertises an additional SRv6 Service SID in BGP
routes which is called No-Further-
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'MVPN/EVPN Tunnel Aggregation with Common Labels'
(draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-14.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Jim Guichard, Andrew A
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-09.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the
IETF.
Title: EVPN Interworking with IPVPN
Authors: J. Rabadan
A. Sajassi
E. Rosen
J. Drake
W. Lin
FYI
This version addresses the comments from Jeff Hass about the section on route
aggregation. Please pay close attention to it and provide any feedback you may
have.
Also the security section has been improved based on Jeff’s feedback as well.
Big thank you to Jeff, from all the authors, for al
All,
Primary agenda has been posted. Please send me slot request for BESS 118.
Mankamana
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-13.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the IETF.
Title: Preference-based EVPN DF Election
Authors: J. Rabadan
S. Sathappan
W. Lin
J. Drake
A. Sajassi
Hi John,
Thanks again!
Both things are now fixed in version 13.
Jorge
From: John Scudder via Datatracker
Date: Monday, October 9, 2023 at 2:08 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...@ietf.org
, bess@ietf.org , Stephane Litkowski
, slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sub
Dear authors
I would like to provide some feedback on this draft follow up from the
presentation given at IETF 117.
After reviewing this draft it seems this draft is trying apply the concept
of “service sid” to both SR-MPLS and SRv6 uSID forwarding planes.
Interesting idea.
This draft seems to o
Dear authors
Slight correction on SRv6 uSID service sid.
So the F3216 uSID format 32 bit block with 16 bit uSID entry in the uSID
carrier, you can have different types or “service sid” which comes out of
the expanded WLIB wide LIB local SID block allocation.
Nice thing about SRv6 is sky is the
Dear Authors
To help provide some clarity on MNA, MNA (MPLS Network Actions) inherits
it’s extensibility concepts from the IPv6 data plane extension header
concept with HBH header -MPLS parity with hop by hop bSPL (base special
purpose label) which is the topmost transport label in the label s
12 matches
Mail list logo
