Hi John,
You have highlighted below a very important point. It was discussed among
co-authors, but perhaps not sufficiently during the BESS process as the
issue is really not a BESS WG problem.
In BGP protocol any new service deployment using existing AFI/SAFI is not
easy. Especially when you are
Sorry, I am delayed on this.
Few minutes back I resubmitted this draft as “draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz” to
replace “draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz” as instructed by Matthew below.
Now it shows submission is pending approval by group chairs.
Thanks,
Satya
From: Arie Vayner
Date: Wednesday, February
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 07:01:35AM +, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
> Thanks john for providing input. New version of draft accommodated all of
> these changes.
Thanks John, thanks Mankamana.
I have balloted No Objection on the -18.
-Ben
___
