Re: [bess] Please send me slot request for IETF 113 (BESS is only remote )

2022-02-23 Thread Dikshit, Saumya
Hi Mankamana, Can you please help with the Link/url to post the slide deck. Thanks Saumya. From: BESS on behalf of Dikshit, Saumya Sent: Saturday, 19 February 2022, 13:39 To: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis); bess@ietf.org Cc: Joshi, Vinayak Subject: Re: [bess] Ple

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].

2022-02-23 Thread Arie Vayner
Pinging the thread as it's been quiet since Dec '21. Tnx Arie On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 1:10 PM Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > > > Thanks for your comments. > > We will republish this draft as draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz-00 shortly. > > > > Best Regards, > > --Satya > > > > *From:

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-02-23 Thread John Scudder
Further to this point: > On Feb 18, 2022, at 3:32 PM, John Scudder wrote: > >> On Feb 17, 2022, at 3:19 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: >> >>> 2. One area of concern I would have hoped IDR might have looked into is, the >>> document makes a creative use of the MPLS Label field of the NLRI to carry

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-02-23 Thread John Scudder
Hi Yao, Thanks for bringing this up. I’ve followed up further in the main thread. Regards, —John > On Feb 17, 2022, at 1:44 AM, liu.ya...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Ron and John both mentioned that leveraging the existing AFI/SAFI may cause > misunderstanding of the SRv6 service rou