Hi Jorge,
A question related to DAD performed by CEs in the context of Proxy-ND.
1) Say is IP1 allocation to MAC1 on a CE is released by the CE 1 (DHCP
release) and IP1 is assigned to MAC2 (CE2) by DHCP server immediately (common
in DCs).
2) Now CE2 tries to perform DAD before accep
Hi Vinayak,
Others can comment too, but these are my comments:
* One of the main benefits of proxy-arp/nd is the reduction of flooding,
and DAD is multicast traffic and it may be significant in an EVPN BD. So
proxy-ND replying to DAD NS messages is still important IMO.
* Although I gue
Hi Jorge,
Thank you for a detailed response.
As you said this is a corner case - hence may be it can be left to
implementation. That is, a PE can have a config knob to treat DAD NS as an
exception and not respond to it.
Regards,
Vinayak
From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) [mailto:
Stephane Litkowski has requested publication of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-07 as Proposed Standard on behalf of
the BESS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/
__
Stephane Litkowski has requested publication of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-08
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the BESS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/
___
BESS ma
Hi Vinayak,
In the document the reply sub-function section says that the PE SHOULD reply to
DAD NS messages, but it is not a MUST. So if your implementation has a config
knob to not reply DAD NS messages as an exception, it could still be compliant
with the document.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Joshi
Hi,
This email starts a two-week working group last call for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc [1]
Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a Standards Track RFC.
This poll runs until the 12th October 2021.
We a
