Hi Jorge and others in Bess WG,
We have come out with a new draft to which proposes a DF-election-mode where in
all the PEs intend to play the DF-role.
Please go through the document and provide your comments:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saumvinayak-bess-all-df-bum/
Thanks
Saumya.
Hi Bess WG members,
This is a request to review this new draft also shared in the separate email
chain and provide your valuable comments.
It indents to solve a deployment use-case leveraging the BGP-EVPN control
plane.
It's an extension ask on DF-election extended community described in RFC858
Hello Bess WG members,
Requesting you to please provide your review comments on the draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt.
This draft intends to provide the optimal solution of dampening a Duplicate MAC
as described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/d
Hi Matthew and BESS WG,
I was informed that our product does support using most of the sub-TLVs
defined in the draft. Please let me know if you have any further questions
regarding the implementation.
Regards,
Greg
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 2:36 PM wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> my apologies for the be
Ciena has partial implementation of the draft.
Thanks,
Sami
On 9/2/21, 10:11 AM, "Parag Jain (paragj)" wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Cisco does not have a shipping implementation of the draft.
As Ali and many other experts replied, LSP ping is widely used for
detecting data plane failures
Hi Matthew,
Ciena has a shipping product with the draft implemented, that are being
deployed by service providers. As such, as a co-author we need the publication
to proceed.
Thanks,
Sami
On 9/3/21, 10:01 AM, "Boutros, Sami" wrote:
Ciena has partial implementation of the draft.
Tha
Hi authors,
I have a few general comments
1. The introduction (section 2) is confusing. You start by saying that
RFC7432 addresses the duplication issue (which is mostly right), but then start
to describe “an unending cycle”..
And just to be clear: RFC7432 does not prescribe an automatic
