Re: [bess] SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-07)

2021-07-23 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
< trimming list to mostly mailers > Hi Mustapha, I agree. Also after seeing Shraddha's latest email, the coverage and details for the fallback mechanisms that she seems to be looking for is quite vast and better tackled in a separate document since this one has completed its WGLC. Some of tho

Re: [bess] SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-07)

2021-07-23 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
That is great. Thank you. Mustapha. From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 11:08 AM To: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: spr...@ietf.org; Shraddha Hegde ; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org Subject: RE: SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services (draft-ie

Re: [bess] [spring] SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-07)

2021-07-23 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Shraddha I agree the fallback mechanisms are important to operators but as there are many complex scenarios related to fallback and some of which include SRv6 to SR-MPLS interworking, I agree that this is important and as such can be captured in a separate document that defines all the permutat