Re: [bess] [spring] SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-07)

2021-07-21 Thread Shraddha Hegde
I agree with Jim that fallback needs to be discussed in the draft . The current draft mandates the resolvability of the service SID. The fact that when flex-algo is allowed to Fallback to best effort, service SID resolvability is not required because service SID corresponds to flex-algo locato

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Oops, this got set aside for much longer than planned (even with the multiple reminders from the authors). My humble apologies for the long delay and the need to be reminded. In part it seems that I misremembered how complicated my concerns were and thus was trying to allocate a larger chunk of tim

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Picking up (belatedly) where I left off in my initial reply... On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote: [snip] > >As the current set of active GWs > > changes (due to the addition of a new GW or the failure/removal of an > > existin

[bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-07-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-07-21 Thread John E Drake
Ben, Thanks for your thorough review and discussion. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: BESS On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk via > Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:22 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@

Re: [bess] [spring] SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-07)

2021-07-21 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hi Shraddha, do you agree this is about switching between shortest path (in base topology or flex-algo topology) and SRv6 policy? You can describe a fallback strategy but the need to resolve or not the service SID is orthogonal and is only dictated by the use of shortest path forwarding or SRv6

Re: [bess] draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-02

2021-07-21 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi Rajesh, As specified in the draft-ietf-srv6-services draft, when using transposition scheme prefix SID attribute carries common part of SRv6 SID (example locator). draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car proposes to carry variable part in SRv6 SID TLV in NLRI when same scheme is used. This helps to be effi

Re: [bess] draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-02

2021-07-21 Thread Rajesh M
Hi Swadesh, This I understood by going through the draft thoroughly. But definitely more clarification is better as you pointed. 1) So SRv6 SID TLV is used only to carry variable part ? it will never carry complete SID ? 2) Is there any case where we carry a complete SID1 in prefix SID a