Section 3
When we say MVPN Pes that have one or more MSDP session in a VPN, does this
statement contradict with “VPN-specific MSDP sessions are not required among
the PEs”?
zzh> The MSDP session that the PEs have are with other non-PE MSDP speakers but
not among themselves, so it does not contr
Hi Qin,
I assume there is one question in your latest email, marked with [Qin3], about
the following paragraph:
The MVPN PEs that act as customer RPs or have one or more MSDP
sessions in a VPN (or the global table in case of GTM) are treated as
an MSDP mesh group for that VPN (or the gl
发件人: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang [mailto:zzh...@juniper.net]
发送时间: 2021年4月30日 22:05
收件人: Qin Wu ; Lenny Giuliano ;
ops-...@ietf.org
抄送: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org;
last-c...@ietf.org
主题: RE: Opsdir last call review of
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interope
Hi Qin,
Before the mechanism in this document is introduced, a PE may need to have MSDP
sessions of both of the following:
1. With non-PE MSDP speakers (e.g. a C-RP)
2. With other PEs
#1 is clearly stated in RFC6514. #2 is mentioned in this document:
… PE2 would need to
have an MS
Jeffrey, thanks for your clarification. I am clear now. Would it be great to
add some clarifications text as an overview somewhere which will add a lot of
clarity. Thanks!
-Qin
发件人： Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhangmailto:zzh...@juniper.net>>
收件人： Qin Wumailto:bill...@huawei.com>>;Lenny
Giulianomailto:le
Hello
I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.
draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway
The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, perform
an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication to the
IESG. The early revi
