Hi WG,
We have now a good amount of support for this document.
It is adopted as a new WG item.
Authors,
Pls republish the document as draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-00
Thanks
From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended Mobility Procedures for EVPN-IRB
Authors : Neeraj Malhotra
Ali Sajass
Support
Thanks,
Jim Uttaro
From: BESS On Behalf Of Krishna Muddenahally
Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 2:58 AM
To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org;
draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
Support
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 10:15 AM, UTTARO, JAMES wrote:
>
> Support
>
> Thanks,
> Jim Uttaro
>
> From: BESS On Behalf Of Krishna Muddenahally
> Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 2:58 AM
> To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; b
Wen,
A few comments.
I think I understand the why of this draft. One could take the
view that a MAC/IP learned via a single PE on an ESI has actually gone away and
will not be re-learned via other PEs on said ESI.. In that case incorrectness
is being injected into t
Hi Muthu,
As you mentioned it is straightforward to calculate the BDF in the default DF
Algorithm by taking the current DF out of reckoning.
It is my personal view that since this is self-evident it need not be
explicitly stated.
But I will let others decide.
Thanks,
--Satya
From: Muthu Arul
Hi James,
Thank you for your comments. Please see replies inline below.
Thanks,
Wen
From: "UTTARO, JAMES"
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 12:20 PM
To: "draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-...@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Mail regarding draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv
Resent
