Hi everyone,
This call was missing a formal closure...
This document is considered ready to move to the next stage.
Best,
-Thomas
Thomas Morin, 2017-06-16 15:43:
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-01 [1] which is c
Hi Ravi,
Many thanks for this review.
One question below...
Ravi Singh, 2017-08-16 06:56:
> The only major comments pertain to
> a. Sections 5.2/8.1: which appear like an overkill and could be
> considered for dropping from text.
[...]
Can you expand on why you this this is overkill ?
T
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Optimized Ingress Replication solution for EVPN
Authors : Jorge Rabadan
Senthil
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for your review and comments. Please see inline for my responses.
On 8/7/17, 2:46 PM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)"
mailto:cpign...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro
Review result: Has Issues
Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro
Review result: Has Nits (and one potential I
Thanks Ali. General Ack to all your responses, make sense.
A follow-up question, though:
I notice “Reserved” in a few places. For example in Figure 4, which seems to
make sense as the Reserved is a Must Be Zero (MBZ)
However, on the Flags, it says:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-
