Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Alvaro, 2015-09-24, Alvaro Retana (aretana): Also, some of the text [...] may not be accesible to the average reader,... As a side note, while what you wrote is true, I would say that it will be hard to fix. Most mVPN-related specs are deemed to remain fairly inaccessible to somebody not

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Jeffrey, all, (below) 2015-09-25, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang: *From:*Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] 5. Section 4. (Security Considerations) Are there really no security considerations? * Section 3.1. (Control State) Says that: "To speed up convergence…P

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Alvaro, [resending, because I had mailer daemon from junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com] 2015-09-24, Alvaro Retana (aretana): Also, some of the text [...] may not be accesible to the average reader,... As a side note, while what you wrote is true, I would say that it will be hard to fix. M

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Jeffrey, all, [resending this one too...] (below) 2015-09-25, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang: *From:*Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] 5. Section 4. (Security Considerations) Are there really no security considerations? * Section 3.1. (Control State) Says that: "To s

Re: [bess] Comments on draft-ietf-bess-ir

2015-09-28 Thread Eric C Rosen
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your review and comments! From the draft: "This document does not provide any new protocol elements or procedures" I think we can agree that it does not specify any new protocol elements. > [Thomas] Sections 3, 4.1.1 and 9, at least, introduce what I think can fai

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

2015-09-28 Thread Wen Lin
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Wen On 7/21/15, 4:19 AM, "UTTARO, JAMES" wrote: >I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft > >Jim Uttaro > >-Original Message- >From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bhupesh Kothari >Sent: Monday, July 20,

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Alvaro, > I-D.ietf-bess-ir and I-D.ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet should be Normative > References. I thought about this further, and would like to keep them both as informational for the following reasons. The extranet draft is referred to in the draft as following: ... The label may be shared wi

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Jeffrey, Alvaroo, 2015-09-28, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang: Alvaro, > I-D.ietf-bess-ir and I-D.ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet should be Normative References. I thought about this further, and would like to keep them both as informational for the following reasons. The extranet draft is referred t

[bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)

2015-09-28 Thread Alissa Cooper
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to h

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags

2015-09-28 Thread Santosh Esale
Yes, Support. Santosh On 9/15/15, 12:43 AM, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-01 [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >n