Re: [bess] [Errata Verified] RFC9135 (7683)

2024-02-12 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi John I agree that there is a typo and that needs to be corrected (i.e., s/PE2/PE1 in line 4). With respect to “Notes”, I am not sure if I am reading it incorrectly: > Notes > - > PE1 will use ARP table for forwarding traffic to PE2 - seems like typo I am reading it as there is a “typo” i

Re: [bess] [Errata Verified] RFC9135 (7683)

2024-02-12 Thread John Scudder
Hi Ali, I already verified this. I can request that the note be revised, but I wanted to double-check if you really disagree with it, or if you were just reading fast. The note says: "PE1 will use ARP table for forwarding traffic to PE2” You say: "PE1 does use the ARP table for forwardi

Re: [bess] [Errata Verified] RFC9135 (7683)

2024-02-11 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Yes, there is a typo in the 4th line and “PE2” needs to be replaced with “PE1” as reflected in “Corrected text”. However the note that says: “PE1 will use ARP table for forwarding traffic to PE2 - seems like typo”, is incorrect. PE1 does use the ARP table for forwarding traffic to PE2 since the