On Saturday, May 18, 2002, at 07:09 , Tagore Smith wrote:
> You're on the right track. Try something like this:
>
> my @array=("aaa", "aaa", "bbb", "bbb", "aaa", "ccc", "aaa", "bbb", "ccc")
> my %hash;
>
> foreach my $item (@array){
> $hash{$item}++;
> }
>
> Tagore Smith
http://www.wetware.
I "think" split is compiled only once while regex (as used in the previous
posts) is compiled everytime a new line is to be matched. (you can use qr//)
Someone fire up Benchmark. I could be wrong :)
xgunnerx
-Original Message-
From: Scot Robnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
drieux wrote:
> On Saturday, May 18, 2002, at 07:09 , Tagore Smith wrote:
>
> > You're on the right track. Try something like this:
> >
> > my @array=("aaa", "aaa", "bbb", "bbb", "aaa", "ccc", "aaa", "bbb",
"ccc")
> > my %hash;
> >
> > foreach my $item (@array){
> > $hash{$item}++;
> > }
> >
On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 02:38 , Tagore Smith wrote:
> drieux wrote:
[..]
>> http://www.wetware.com/drieux/pbl/BenchMarks/uniqCounts.txt
>>
>> ok, so my OCD is benchmarking -
Tagore - thanks for the review - and I fear we agree,
although I feel I owe you some clarifications;
[..]
> and makin
On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 02:30 , Ross Esposito wrote:
> I "think" split is compiled only once while regex (as used in the previous
> posts) is compiled everytime a new line is to be matched. (you can use qr/
> /)
>
> Someone fire up Benchmark. I could be wrong :)
>
> xgunnerx
funny you shoul
I couldn't understand anything, but thank you very much! :-)
I could use the other solutions very easy, but now I have another problem. I
should try to understand your code.
Cheers.
Teddy,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "drieux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cgi" <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 06:29 , Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> I couldn't understand anything, but thank you very much! :-)
my apologies - how can I help make it more understandable?
> I could use the other solutions very easy, but now I have another problem.
better a solution than None!
> I
