On Saturday 02 June 2001 11:34, Christian Campbell wrote:
> What's to stop you from building in a corresponding hidden field
> with the old value (or a hash of the old value) for each displayed
> field? Then you know that a field changed because the
> corresponding hidden field hash value is out o
What's to stop you from building in a corresponding hidden field
with the old value (or a hash of the old value) for each displayed
field? Then you know that a field changed because the
corresponding hidden field hash value is out of sync.
Christian
__
On Saturday 02 June 2001 10:42, Mark Rowlands wrote:
> I'm using DBI and CGI and mysql on apache (freebsd)
>
> I query a table to produce a table rows looking like this
> the idea being that if you hit the check box, we delete the record
> and if you edit the text field we update the record
>
>
>
I'm using DBI and CGI and mysql on apache (freebsd)
I query a table to produce a table rows looking like this
the idea being that if you hit the check box, we delete the record
and if you edit the text field we update the record
dpapache : kista_131
dpapache : kista_132
When I hit s
