Re: XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

2005-09-21 Thread David Dorward
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:18:37AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Dorward wrote: > > XHTML 1.1 is XHTML 1.0 Strict with Ruby added. > Really? Yes. > As in the scripting language Ruby? No. As in the Ruby Annotation language. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-ruby-200

Re: XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

2005-09-21 Thread Chris Devers
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Dorward wrote: > XHTML 1.1 is XHTML 1.0 Strict with Ruby added. Really? As in the scripting language Ruby? Weird... -- Chris Devers öQKÂm݃g5¾ÿ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

2005-09-21 Thread David Dorward
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:11:59PM +0200, MNibble wrote: > I won't say you are wrong, since you are right.I (please don't throw > stones or bits at me) already use css und div span and stuff like that > and if it is called xhtml that's fine for me That isn't what is called XHTML. XHTML 1.0 is