On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> >I stand corrected then! Does Apache interpret the shebang line before
> >running the script? I've had problems with Apache *requiring* the correct
> >drive and pathname for other things in its configuration under Win32.
>
> I believe it does. But
doch
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Win32 Apache and Perl
>
> At 03:59 PM 9/1/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Shannon Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way (I'm sure there is) to make
doch
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Win32 Apache and Perl
>
> At 03:59 PM 9/1/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Shannon Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way (I'm sure there is) to make
ot;Brett W. McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Shannon Murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Win32 Apache and Perl
> At 11:16 PM 9/1/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
> >On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Gunth
At 11:16 PM 9/1/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > I can't say if this still works but if Apache is doing the interpretation I
> > don't see why not. Note that this is an Apache feature -- this won't help
> > you with brain dead web servers like I
Yes, Apache interprets the shebang line before running the script- the
script needs to point to the OS-dependant path to Perl before it will run.
-Shannon
> I stand corrected then! Does Apache interpret the shebang line before
> running the script? I've had problems with Apache *requiring* th
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> I can't say if this still works but if Apache is doing the interpretation I
> don't see why not. Note that this is an Apache feature -- this won't help
> you with brain dead web servers like IIS that make it really hard to set up
> CGI/Perl. But sinc
doch
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Win32 Apache and Perl
>
> At 03:59 PM 9/1/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Shannon Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way (I'm sure there is) to make
At 03:59 PM 9/1/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
>On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Shannon Murdoch wrote:
>
> > Is there any way (I'm sure there is) to make my perl scripts run with the
> > standard unix shebang instead?
>
>Yes, use Unix. :-)
So helpful for the Operating System "challenged". :)
>If you are
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Shannon Murdoch wrote:
> Is there any way (I'm sure there is) to make my perl scripts run with the
> standard unix shebang instead?
Yes, use Unix. :-)
If you are usig ActiveState, you have to use the Windows way of using
pathnames. If you are using CygWin (which is a POSIX
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a localhost Apache server to test my scripts on before
launching on to the web, but am seeming always to need to put the win32
shebang (#!C:\perl\bin\perl.exe) at the start of scripts instead of the
usual unix one (#!/usr/bin/perl) to make them work.
Is there any way
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a localhost Apache server to test my scripts on before
launching on to the web, but am seeming always to need to put the win32
shebang (#!C:\perl\bin\perl.exe) at the start of scripts instead of the
usual unix one (#!/usr/bin/perl) to make them work.
Is there any way
12 matches
Mail list logo
