On Saturday 02 June 2001 11:34, Christian Campbell wrote:
> What's to stop you from building in a corresponding hidden field
> with the old value (or a hash of the old value) for each displayed
> field? Then you know that a field changed because the
> corresponding hidden field hash value is out o
What's to stop you from building in a corresponding hidden field
with the old value (or a hash of the old value) for each displayed
field? Then you know that a field changed because the
corresponding hidden field hash value is out of sync.
Christian
__
On Saturday 02 June 2001 10:42, Mark Rowlands wrote:
> I'm using DBI and CGI and mysql on apache (freebsd)
>
> I query a table to produce a table rows looking like this
> the idea being that if you hit the check box, we delete the record
> and if you edit the text field we update the record
>
>
>
