t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: Mail::Send question
Camilo Gonzalez wrote:
> Todd W. wrote:
>
>> "Camilo Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
&g
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:13:06 +0300, "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What mail module can be used to send email messages with attachments?
> I would prefer a module included in the perl package by default.
>
MIME::Lite is a good cho
Camilo Gonzalez wrote:
Todd W. wrote:
"Camilo Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Definitely avoid this if possible, there are numerous mail message
modules, one of them is bound to provide what you need.
Why is sendmail held in such low regard by this g
>> Fine, go get the SendMail book, rent a truck to bring it home in,
A very large truck, OR the Abridged version.
>>The box said 'Windows XP or better' so I chose Mac OS X.
Must have been a trick requirement. Nearly everything is better.
=
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d
, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Camilo Gonzalez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail::Send question
On 8/4/03 at 11:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Camilo Gonzalez) wrote:
> I sometimes wonder if all this shielding of intricacies is necessarly
> a good thing. Shouldn't I know how to use sendmail? I gues
On 8/4/03 at 11:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Camilo Gonzalez) wrote:
> I sometimes wonder if all this shielding of intricacies is necessarly
> a good thing. Shouldn't I know how to use sendmail? I guess I'm a DIY
> kind of guy and I want to know how sendmail works. Fine, if a module
> makes it all ea
Todd W. wrote:
"Camilo Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Definitely avoid this if possible, there are numerous mail message
modules, one of them is bound to provide what you need.
Why is sendmail held in such low regard by this group?
Most on thi
"Camilo Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Definitely avoid this if possible, there are numerous mail message
> > modules, one of them is bound to provide what you need.
>
> Why is sendmail held in such low regard by this group?
>
Most on this list will agre
On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 11:09 PM, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
Camilo Gonzalez wrote:
Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
Scot Robnett wrote:
Is there any way to force Mail::Send to accept a "From" name, as
opposed to
simply sending and using the hostname by default? I don't see
anything in
the docs ab
Camilo Gonzalez wrote:
Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
Scot Robnett wrote:
Is there any way to force Mail::Send to accept a "From" name, as
opposed to
simply sending and using the hostname by default? I don't see
anything in
the docs about setting the "From" field in the headers.
(of course, I can ju
Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
Scot Robnett wrote:
Is there any way to force Mail::Send to accept a "From" name, as
opposed to
simply sending and using the hostname by default? I don't see
anything in
the docs about setting the "From" field in the headers.
(of course, I can just open a pipe to sendm
That did the trick. Thanks!
Scot R.
inSite
-Original Message-
From: Wiggins d'Anconia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:59 PM
To: Scot Robnett
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail::Send question
Scot Robnett wrote:
> Is there any way to force Mail:
Scot Robnett wrote:
Is there any way to force Mail::Send to accept a "From" name, as opposed to
simply sending and using the hostname by default? I don't see anything in
the docs about setting the "From" field in the headers.
(of course, I can just open a pipe to sendmail, but I want to see if ther
13 matches
Mail list logo
