RE: uninitialised value strings

2001-08-30 Thread Francesco Scaglioni
Thank you very much for that. I am amazed at how you find the time to help as much as you do. I shall endeavour to continue to learn. Cheers again Francesco -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: uninitialised value strings

2001-08-29 Thread Curtis Poe
--- Francesco Scaglioni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again, > > the script now reads ( see below ) but I still get errors as follows: > > ** (at end of line) = where use of uninitialised value in cancatenation and > *** (at end of line) = where use of uninitialised value in pattern > match

Re: uninitialised value strings

2001-08-29 Thread Dwalu Z. Khasu
=>The attached snippet of code produces errors of unitialised value =>strings for the lines I have marked. The script compiles OK. What =>obvious newbie thing am I missing? => =>Cheers & Thanks => =>Francesco => =>#!/usr/bin/perl -w =># =># add taint check later => =>use CGI qw(:standard); =>u

RE: uninitialised value strings

2001-08-29 Thread Bradley M. Handy
Most likely because no data is being passed to the script. Brad > -Original Message- > From: Francesco Scaglioni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: uninitialised value

RE: uninitialised value strings

2001-08-29 Thread Francesco Scaglioni
Hi again, the script now reads ( see below ) but I still get errors as follows: ** (at end of line) = where use of uninitialised value in cancatenation and *** (at end of line) = where use of uninitialised value in pattern match How should I initialise those values? Cheers Francessco #!/us

RE: uninitialised value strings

2001-08-29 Thread Bradley M. Handy
> -Original Message- > From: Francesco Scaglioni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: uninitialised value strings > > > Hi, > > I have been playing around with the rat book but have the following > problem: > > The attac