Re: Probably a simple problem

2002-08-16 Thread Steve Grazzini
Patricia Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks!! But reading at that site, it says, "They must run under Perl > 5.004_04 or later. Any earlier Perl than this is pre-historic and can > therefore be safely ignored." and the version the host offers is 5.005_03. > > Looks like I'll be learning

Re: Probably a simple problem

2002-08-16 Thread drieux
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 08:34 , Patricia Gillard wrote: > Thanks!! But reading at that site, it says, "They must run under Perl > 5.004_04 or later. Any earlier Perl than this is pre-historic and can > therefore be safely ignored." and the version the host offers is 5.005_03. > > Looks

RE: Probably a simple problem

2002-08-16 Thread Bob Showalter
> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Probably a simple problem > > ... > What I have learned about Perl at the new server is that it > is Perl version > 5.005_03, mod_perl1.2

RE: Probably a simple problem

2002-08-15 Thread Patricia Gillard
Thanks!! But reading at that site, it says, "They must run under Perl 5.004_04 or later. Any earlier Perl than this is pre-historic and can therefore be safely ignored." and the version the host offers is 5.005_03. Looks like I'll be learning Perl the hard way. ;-) Patty -Original Message-

Re: Probably a simple problem

2002-08-15 Thread fliptop
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 at 20:36, Patricia Gillard opined: PG:Probably a simple problem, hopefully with a simple answer. PG: PG:I recently moved my web domain to a new host service and suddenly my scripts PG:don't work. The scripts were ones I had downloaded from Matt's Script PG:Archive, and they w