Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-07-01 Thread perl-dvd
11:39 AM Subject: Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Curtis, > You make some good points. I will be leaving in about 10 minutes for a >vacation, and wont be > back until Monday, so if you wouldn't mind sending an email to th

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-07-01 Thread Ovid
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Curtis, > You make some good points. I will be leaving in about 10 minutes for a >vacation, and wont be > back until Monday, so if you wouldn't mind sending an email to the list Monday as a >reminder, I > will submit the code then. > > Thanks, > David David,

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread fliptop
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] opined: :With mine, there is nothing beyond what I described. The hash structure I gave you :below, that's :it. Form.pm takes the input, makes a hash with it, and if you understand how to use :a hash and :array ref, your set. Its just a hash, no objects

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread perl-dvd
eeing dictionary.com's definition, I wondered. Well thank you for the compliment. David - Original Message - From: "John Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:39 PM Subject: Re: CGI.pm v/s ro

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread John Brooking
AIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Todd Wade" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:57 PM > Subject: Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] > Displaying Problems > > > After all, Hubris is

RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread Scot Robnett
True. Whew, my hand hurts from all that extra typing. ;) Scot R. -Original Message- From: John Brooking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:50 PM To: Scot Robnett; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Felix Geerinckx Subject: RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread perl-dvd
- Original Message - From: "John Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Todd Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:57 PM Subject: Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Proble

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread John Brooking
After all, Hubris is one of St. Larry's Three Cardinal Virtues! So this seems to me to be a properly Perl-ish attitude. - John --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > minded here, I'm just the type of person who if I'm > not perfectly happy with the way something works > (whether programming or in

RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread John Brooking
See?! Your version just expanded by 50% !! ;-) --- Scot Robnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Picky, picky. :) > You're right, my bad. > > use CGI; > my $q = new CGI; > my %params = $q->Vars; = "Now it's over, I'm dead, and I haven't done anything that I want; or, I'm still alive, and the

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread perl-dvd
ok at it within a months time if you so choose. David - Original Message - From: "Scot Robnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:03 AM Subject: RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems I haven't seen

RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread Scot Robnett
; '/tmp/fileupload/tmpfile-10028983-88.57.192.3-2783-298374-927837' } # for files ); Of coarse I know the image information is not in there the same way. David - Original Message ----- From: "Scot Robnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc:

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread perl-dvd
pload/tmpfile-10028983-88.57.192.3-2783-298374-927837' } # for files ); Of coarse I know the image information is not in there the same way. David - Original Message ----- From: "Scot Robnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Felix Geeri

Re: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread perl-dvd
The difference is, the efficiency and data structure CGI.pm returns. Mine came to I think 72 times faster when not uploading images, and 2.5 times faster when uploading images. I'm not saying CGI.pm is written poorly or anything, I am saying that it is a little bit bloated and has a lot o

RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-27 Thread Scot Robnett
Picky, picky. :) You're right, my bad. use CGI; my $q = new CGI; my %params = $q->Vars; SR -Original Message- From: Felix Geerinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Di

RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-26 Thread Felix Geerinckx
on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 02:54:10 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scot Robnett) wrote: >> Its pretty hard to make it more simple than: >> use Form; >> my %input = Form(); > > Let me try. > > > use CGI; > %params = $q->Vars; > Try again. Your c

RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Problems

2002-06-26 Thread Scot Robnett
> Its pretty hard to make it more simple than: > use Form; > my %input = Form(); Let me try. use CGI; %params = $q->Vars; Scot R. inSite