RE: CGI.pm == ugly source output

2002-04-15 Thread Don Krause
IANAE, but I've been using it in addition to, ie: use CGI qw(-debug :standard); use CGI::Pretty; On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:02, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:53:50 -0400, Don Krause wrote: > > How about: > > > > use CGI::Pretty > > WOW! I didn't know this existed -- o

RE: CGI.pm == ugly source output

2002-04-15 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:53:50 -0400, Don Krause wrote: > How about: > > use CGI::Pretty WOW! I didn't know this existed -- or where to look! Thanks. By the way, from looking at the perldoc for the module, I'm still uncertain of how to invoce it -- is it INSTEAD of use CGI; or IN ADDITION to

RE: CGI.pm == ugly source output

2002-04-15 Thread Don Krause
How about: use CGI::Pretty On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 14:44, Nikola Janceski wrote: > uh... remember our friend... the $\ > > $\ = "\n"; > > can make some nice things! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 20

RE: CGI.pm == ugly source output

2002-04-15 Thread Nikola Janceski
uh... remember our friend... the $\ $\ = "\n"; can make some nice things! > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CGI.pm == ugly source output > > > I've been using