Re: XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:18:37AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Dorward wrote: > > XHTML 1.1 is XHTML 1.0 Strict with Ruby added. > Really? Yes. > As in the scripting language Ruby? No. As in the Ruby Annotation language. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-ruby-200

Re: XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Dorward wrote: > XHTML 1.1 is XHTML 1.0 Strict with Ruby added. Really? As in the scripting language Ruby? Weird... -- Chris Devers öQKÂm݃g5¾ÿ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: One link to 2 frames

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:29:15PM +0200, MNibble wrote: > The time delay, well yes there is a problem, but i can't fix that on, so > this needs to be my workaround. There a lot a data that needs to be > processed, and i didn't want the user to wait for that page, so i put a > side befor the out

Re: One link to 2 frames

David Dorward wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 08:32:47AM +0200, MNibble wrote: Thx both of you. But i realy think there musst be a possibilty. I have two javascript funktions which i try to get rid of. This started off as a simple case of populating two frames in response to one user action

XHTML (was Re: One link to 2 frames)

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:11:59PM +0200, MNibble wrote: > I won't say you are wrong, since you are right.I (please don't throw > stones or bits at me) already use css und div span and stuff like that > and if it is called xhtml that's fine for me That isn't what is called XHTML. XHTML 1.0 is

Re: One link to 2 frames

Jimmy George wrote: Hello MNibble As a couple of other writers have said. Why are you using 'HTML FRAMES' and JavaScript to load them? Get a book on CSS and read it carefully. Then try a few things. Use XHTML preferably and it is all done on 'the user side'. That one CSS file can describe every

Re: One link to 2 frames

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 08:32:47AM +0200, MNibble wrote: > Thx both of you. But i realy think there musst be a possibilty. I have > two javascript funktions which i try to get rid of. This started off as a simple case of populating two frames in response to one user action (at least as far as I

Re: One link to 2 frames

Bill Stephenson wrote: On Sep 20, 2005, at 7:05 AM, MNibble wrote: Aloha is there a standard solution to this problem, by now i do this with a javascript, but i want to change it. Thanks for your time MNibble I think with CGI it would be to create, then send to the client, the main htm

Re: One link to 2 frames

Hello MNibble As a couple of other writers have said. Why are you using 'HTML FRAMES' and JavaScript to load them? Get a book on CSS and read it carefully. Then try a few things. Use XHTML preferably and it is all done on 'the user side'. That one CSS file can describe every page you want to have

Re: One link to 2 frames

On Sep 20, 2005, at 7:05 AM, MNibble wrote: Aloha is there a standard solution to this problem, by now i do this with a javascript, but i want to change it. Thanks for your time MNibble I think with CGI it would be to create, then send to the client, the main html page which contains the

Re: One link to 2 frames

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:05:09PM +0200, MNibble wrote: > is there a standard solution to this problem To what problem? (Please don't depend on people reading subject lines). There are two: 1. Don't use frames. http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?Problems_with_using_frames 2. Link to a new frames

One link to 2 frames

Aloha is there a standard solution to this problem, by now i do this with a javascript, but i want to change it. Thanks for your time MNibble -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]