Re: Form.pm (next installment of code review)

2002-07-08 Thread Ovid
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Curtis, > Thank you for your observations and compliments (first paragraph). No your >right, I haven't > been using taint (*I hang my head in shame*). Actually, you may not *want* to use taint checking in your code samples. The end user should control that a

Re: Form.pm (next installment of code review)

2002-07-08 Thread perl-dvd
that the system may be using because on a windows server this is different than on a Linux box. I will check how CGI.pm does it to get some other ideas. Thanks, David ----- Original Message - From: "Ovid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Form.pm (next installment of code review)

2002-07-05 Thread Ovid
Hi David, While I raise quite a few issues here, I have to say that I've rarely seen anyone present a CGI.pm alternative that supports uploads. I'm quite impressed, so keep that in mind while I pick it apart :) I'll ignore anything I may have covered in my discussion about the previous subrout