On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 01:33 , Joel Hughes wrote:
>
> the dark side? would that be Python or C++?
>
> joel
Speaking of which - why would I want to do my CGI
in perl - rather than go with tomcat servlets in
all java - or write the apache module in 'c'
ciao
drieux
---
--
To u
the dark side? would that be Python or C++?
joel
-Original Message-
From: matt stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 09:24
To: 'drieux'; cgi cgi-list
Subject: RE: First and second rate programmers
So much bitterness, i FEEL your pain - let it all out.
S
So much bitterness, i FEEL your pain - let it all out.
Strike down your enemies, and the path to the dark side will be
complete..
-Original Message-
From: drieux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 18:32
To: cgi cgi-list
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First and second
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 08:40 , Ovid wrote:
[..]
>
> First-rate mathematicians want to hang around
first-rate
> mathematicians. Second-rate mathematicians want
to hang
> around third-rate mathematicians.
>
> The reason for that is left as an exercise for the
reader :)
So, i
I don't think that "use strict" is necessary in a finished script. I think
anything that takes up machine cycles and isn't needed in the finished script
should remain mobile and this is probably the main reason they keep it
mobileyou might say "but how many macine cycles could it possibly
If your as lazy as I am and hate to type you wouldn't have this debate...I can't
remember ever
writing a script that I started from scratch for years now. I almost always start with
an existing
script cause 9 times out of 10 it has something in it I'll need anyway...and I am
the cut 'n'
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 08:40 , Ovid wrote:
[..]
>
> First-rate mathematicians want to hang around first-rate
> mathematicians. Second-rate mathematicians want to hang
> around third-rate mathematicians.
>
> The reason for that is left as an exercise for the reader :)
>
> Chee
--- Jake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im a bit worried that a few of my statements have been misconstrued, and I was
> concerned that would happen when I first posted.
Jake,
No worries, I didn't misconstrue your comments. I deliberately changed the subject in
hopes that
no one would think I w
onstraints such as warnings and strict.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: First and second rate programmers
>
>
> Im a bit worried tha
Im a bit worried that a few of my statements have been misconstrued, and I was
concerned that would happen when I first posted. Let me try to clarify - and
I should also preface this with I am primarily a C/C++ programmer (I'm
addicted to the Qt toolkit) who really uses perl only when he needs
To all:
Okay, there have been a few comments about the merits of using strict, but I thought I
would toss
up a meta-argument.
It's true that posters who post code without "strict" are generally reminded by
several replies
that they should have used strict, but the respondents also usually try
11 matches
Mail list logo
