IANAE, but I've been using it in addition to, ie:
use CGI qw(-debug :standard);
use CGI::Pretty;
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:02, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:53:50 -0400, Don Krause wrote:
> > How about:
> >
> > use CGI::Pretty
>
> WOW! I didn't know this existed -- o
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:53:50 -0400, Don Krause wrote:
> How about:
>
> use CGI::Pretty
WOW! I didn't know this existed -- or where to look! Thanks. By the way,
from looking at the perldoc for the module, I'm still uncertain of how to
invoce it -- is it INSTEAD of
use CGI;
or IN ADDITION to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:57 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: CGI.pm == ugly source output
> >
> >
> > I've been using CGI.pm for a few months now, and whileI'm
> > thrilled with
> > what I can do with it
uh... remember our friend... the $\
$\ = "\n";
can make some nice things!
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CGI.pm == ugly source
I've been using CGI.pm for a few months now, and whileI'm thrilled with
what I can do with it, I'm terribly frustrated with the HTML output it
creates -- not the way the browser parses it, but the source output.
I often need to debug what was sent, and I hate going through these HUGE
lines of tex
