Was: "5.005_03 vs. 5.8", should be "pure perl"

2002-12-04 Thread Scot Robnett
If I don't have to be root or do a make install, why am I not able to get modules like Expat to install successfully, and why does their documentation tell me that's what I have to do? It seems like if there's another option, the pod docs or readme should tell me so. If there's another alternative

RE: 5.005_03 vs. 5.8

2002-12-04 Thread wiggins
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:03:37 -0600, "Scot Robnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Modules that are not pure perl have some sort of compiled > supporting file associated with them True. > and must be installed by root using a 'make install'. Fals

Re: 5.005_03 vs. 5.8

2002-12-04 Thread drieux
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 05:11 US/Pacific, fliptop wrote: [..] if you're using redhat linux, i'd recommend using whatever rpm they have. for rh7.3, the current perl is 5.6.1. for rh8, it's 5.8.0. [..] about the only 'bug' I ran into with the rh7.3 release of 5.6.1 was that they did not buil

RE: 5.005_03 vs. 5.8

2002-12-04 Thread Scot Robnett
"Pure perl" (probably oversimplified) means that you can install the module yourself by placing it and any of its supporting files in a directory and calling it with 'use lib' or pushing/unshifting it into @INC. Modules that are not pure perl have some sort of compiled supporting file associated wi

Re: 5.005_03 vs. 5.8

2002-12-04 Thread Octavian Rasnita
I've seen some differences between Perl 5.6.1 and 5.8, but only under Windows which is not your case. A problem of Perl 5.8 under Windows is that the module DBD::mysql cannot be installed with PPM. It might be compiled with a C compiler, I don't know. However, MySQL can be used under Windows and P