While I have seen this obvious hoax before and know people have fallen
for it. We could turn this into something more appropriate. Can anyone
generate an appropriate regex that will identify this email. It should
be able to find variants but not too open ended that it flags the wrong
files.
Lynn
ok i figured out what i did wrong, no need to reply..
thnx
nate
ok so im still working away on this weather thing(i would like to thank mark solomon,
if he ever reads this stuff, for writing a great weather modual!!!) but im searching a
variable for a certain phrase, its not finding it, but i know its there, and i cant
figure out whats not matching,(i suck
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Curtis Poe) wrote:
> End this thread, please. If you have something to say to this individual,
> please do so privately.
> Yes, the spam was innapropriate, but I find it a bit ironic that the
> spam-haters have generated
> so much, uh, spam
Hi,
The HTML4 spec reads:
"Each scripting language has its own conventions for referring to HTML
objects from within a script. This specification does not define a
standard mechanism for referring to HTML objects. However, scripts should
refer to an element according to its assigned name. Scrip
End this thread, please. If you have something to say to this individual, please do
so privately.
Yes, the spam was innapropriate, but I find it a bit ironic that the spam-haters have
generated
so much, uh, spam.
--- lynn bui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey,
>
> this does not concern perl,
