On 4/22/2011 3:17 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I recall that the traffic on the list was very overwhelming and that someone
commented to me that whenever he set to compose a message answering a
beginner, he already got several good replies by the time he finished. The
traffic now may also be a bit too
There is a person on the Internet using this to advise his email
address.
perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.liamg\100halbhalb/"
I am intrigued as to how "001\" becomes "@"
What should I be reading?
TIA
Owen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additiona
Owen wrote:
There is a person on the Internet using this to advise his email
address.
perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.liamg\100halbhalb/"
I am intrigued as to how "001\" becomes "@"
"\100" is interpolated as "@" before the string is reversed.
You could also write that as:
perl -le
On 4/24/2011 12:38 PM, David Christensen wrote:
The way I see it, "Cyberbulling" is much more persistent than just
making one
comment on a post to a public mailing list.
Perhaps. Note that people on this list have already stated that certain
people have a history of questionable conduct on th
Hi Owen. G'day.
On 27 April 2011 19:13, Owen wrote:
> There is a person on the Internet using this to advise his email
> address.
>
> perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.liamg\100halbhalb/"
>
> I am intrigued as to how "001\" becomes "@"
Try this :-)
perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/ua.gro.
Hi,
Please could you advice, how can i write a regular expression for the
line below to capture 0079 and 69729260057253303030373
0079 Not Visible 69729260057253303030373
i tried this one, no luck
/(^\d{4})\s\w+\s\w+\s+\d+/ig)
Appreciate your help with this.
Sj
-
2011/4/27 jet speed
> Hi,
>
> Please could you advice, how can i write a regular expression for the
> line below to capture 0079 and 69729260057253303030373
>
>
> 0079 Not Visible 69729260057253303030373
>
> i tried this one, no luck
>
> /(^\d{4})\s\w+\s\w+\s+\d+/ig)
>
Hi Ted,
It was a thought provoking E-mail. Let me reply.
On Wednesday 27 Apr 2011 11:58:48 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> On 4/22/2011 3:17 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I recall that the traffic on the list was very overwhelming and that
> > someone commented to me that whenever he set to compose a mess
On 11-04-27 06:47 AM, jet speed wrote:
0079 Not Visible 69729260057253303030373
Try this:
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $text = '0079 Not Visible 69729260057253303030373';
my @numbers = $text =~ /(\d+)/g;
print "@numbers\n";
__END_
2011/4/27 jet speed :
> Hi,
>
> Please could you advice, how can i write a regular expression for the
> line below to capture 0079 and 69729260057253303030373
>
>
> 0079 Not Visible 69729260057253303030373
>
This might help?
$ perl -le '
$str="0079 Not Visible
Hi Jenda,
2011/4/26 Jenda Krynicky :
> From: Raymond Wan
>> Hm, sounds like you think that if the problem is ignored, it will go
>> away?
>
> Some problems are real, some imaginary. The later kind is better
> ignored.
Yes...well, I would think whether or not it is imaginary should not be
On 2011-04-27 10:58, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
things are not so polite on this list anymore
Just another example of self hypnosis.
As I already suggested before:
kill file all posters that post off-topic without flagging it as such,
and let all '[OT]' flagged messages be marked as read, and th
If needed, there is a good complete table of the ASCII values at
http://www.asciitable.com/
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ishwor Gurung [mailto:ishwor.gur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:46 AM
To: Perl Beginners
Subject: Re: How does this work?
Hi Owen. G'day.
On 27 Apri
On 27/04/2011 11:47, jet speed wrote:
Please could you advice, how can i write a regular expression for the
line below to capture 0079 and 69729260057253303030373
0079 Not Visible 69729260057253303030373
i tried this one, no luck
/(^\d{4})\s\w+\s\w+\s+\d+/ig)
It
Hi all,
Thanks for all our inputs,
The regular expression below works fine if do it for single line, i am
trying to caputre the match $1, and $2 into array. only the first line
is pushed to the array. what am i doing wrong ?
how to get all the $1 and $2 match values for each line into arrary ?
Ki
On 4/27/11 Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:32 AM, "jet speed"
scribbled:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all our inputs,
>
> The regular expression below works fine if do it for single line, i am
> trying to caputre the match $1, and $2 into array. only the first line
> is pushed to the array. what am i doing wr
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:32:57PM +0100, jet speed wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all our inputs,
>
> The regular expression below works fine if do it for single line, i am
> trying to caputre the match $1, and $2 into array. only the first line
> is pushed to the array. what am i doing wrong ?
On 11-04-27 12:47 PM, Jim Gibson wrote:
The metasymbol \d matches the characters [0-9], not the extended hexadecimal
set that includes A-Z. To match those, construct your own character class:
[0-9A-Z]
You can use the POSIX xdigit character class instead:
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use w
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> On 11-04-27 12:47 PM, Jim Gibson wrote:
>
>> The metasymbol \d matches the characters [0-9], not the extended
>> hexadecimal
>> set that includes A-Z. To match those, construct your own character class:
>>
>> [0-9A-Z]
>>
>
> You can use the
On 2011-04-27 18:47, Jim Gibson wrote:
The metasymbol \d matches the characters [0-9],
Beware: the \d matches 250+ code points. So don't use \d if you only
mean [0-9].
not the extended hexadecimal
set that includes A-Z. To match those, construct your own character class:
[0-9A-Z]
Or us
Excellent Guys, I would like thank each one of you for inputs. Much
appreciated.
i got blinded by just the numbers 0079, i didn't cater for the next line
which is hex 007A, as one of you rightly pointed out [ 0-9A-Z] , does the
trick. its amazing to see different technique to achieve the same res
Hello all,
In the source code of some bioperl modules, I saw method names start with "_".
For instance, _print, in the following lines:
$self->_print($buff);
$self->_print("\n");
But I couldn’t find the subroutine or function definition for these methods
anywhere. Are these special or internal m
2011/4/28 heyi xiao :
> Hello all,
> In the source code of some bioperl modules, I saw method names start with
> "_". For instance, _print, in the following lines:
> $self->_print($buff);
> $self->_print("\n");
>
These generally mean internal methods, but you could also call them
from external pa
On 11-04-27 09:16 PM, heyi xiao wrote:
Hello all,
In the source code of some bioperl modules, I saw method names start with "_".
For instance, _print, in the following lines:
$self->_print($buff);
$self->_print("\n");
But I couldn’t find the subroutine or function definition for these methods
2011/4/27 Tim Lewis :
> If needed, there is a good complete table of the ASCII values at
> http://www.asciitable.com/
>
Good resource.
BTW, what do "Hx" and "Oct" in the table mean?
And what's the difference between them?
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For ad
Jeff Pang wrote:
2011/4/27 Tim Lewis:
If needed, there is a good complete table of the ASCII values at
http://www.asciitable.com/
Good resource.
BTW, what do "Hx" and "Oct" in the table mean?
And what's the difference between them?
Hx = hexadecimal
Oct = octal
Hexadecimal is the base 16 re
> "SHC" == Shawn H Corey writes:
SHC> On 11-04-27 09:16 PM, heyi xiao wrote:
>> In the source code of some bioperl modules, I saw method names
>> start with "_". For instance, _print, in the following lines:
>> $self->_print($buff);
>> $self->_print("\n");
>> But I couldn’t fin
On 11-04-28 12:20 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
methods starting with _ are conventionally private
methods.
Actually, I think they are "protected" methods. Those methods that
should not be access by other objects but can be by their child classes.
A truly private method can be written as a sub ref
> "SHC" == Shawn H Corey writes:
SHC> On 11-04-28 12:20 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> methods starting with _ are conventionally private
>> methods.
SHC> Actually, I think they are "protected" methods. Those methods that
SHC> should not be access by other objects but can be by their c
2011/4/28 Uri Guttman :
>
> the _ prefix is the only common way to mark a private OR protected
> method as perl doesn't directly provide any support for it. moose and
> other OO systems may support this.
I may think Perl OO (not moose) doesn't have private or protected
methods as other languages
> "JP" == Jeff Pang writes:
JP> 2011/4/28 Uri Guttman :
>>
>> the _ prefix is the only common way to mark a private OR protected
>> method as perl doesn't directly provide any support for it. moose and
>> other OO systems may support this.
JP> I may think Perl OO (not moose) do
Remove me from the mailing list please
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, Jeff Pang wrote:
> 2011/4/28 Uri Guttman :
>
>>
>> the _ prefix is the only common way to mark a private OR protected
>> method as perl doesn't directly provide any support for it. moose and
>> other OO systems may support this.
2011/4/28 N :
> Remove me from the mailing list please
>
please send an empty mail to:
beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
33 matches
Mail list logo
