If you are using a Windows System, you can go into the Control Panel, click
"Enable or Disable Windows Components" and select IIS. Depending on
your version of Windows, you should either have IIS 6 / 7, probably IIS7 if
you are using Windows 7 as well. After selecting it, let Windows Install it,
th
It would depend on your level of expertise and if you are just wanting someone
to do your work for you and not read manuals or if you need help with complex
problems.
ITToolbox has various lists for starting out and if you google you will find
various advanced ones
Cheers
Peter
On 13/04/201
Peter,
Thanks for the response, i am a beginner level of DBA. I am looking
for an help with beginer level of knoweldge. Can you please some group ids
where i can get this ?
regards,
Raveendu
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter McLarty <
peter.mcla...@pacificdbms.com.au> wrote:
> It woul
Hi Uri and Peter,
On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 09:15:35 Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "PS" == Peter Scott writes:
> PS> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:57:53 -0700, Mariano Loza Coll wrote:
> >> Like Owen, I've come across many a recommendation AGAINST using goto
> >> in Perl. And (like Owen?), I have yet t
On 11-04-14 12:57 AM, Mariano Loza Coll wrote:
I have yet to find one that explains
clearly the reasons arguing against its use.
It's a religious thing. It is far better to hide your gotos in a state
machine than to expose them to light.
Example of a state machine with hidden gotos:
my $do
> "SF" == Shlomi Fish writes:
SF> On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 09:15:35 Uri Guttman wrote:
>> > "PS" == Peter Scott writes:
PS> Here is the definitive explanation:
>> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ PS> ewd02xx/EWD215.PDF .
>>
>> having heard about that article for many year
Thanks to both Peter Scott, and Brian Fraser (who wrote me off-list).
Very informative. I'm cleaning up a very old script that uses the &subroutine
construct and learning more Perl in the process.
> If you're worried about the speed overhead of one vs the other then either
> you are w
(Sorry, Uri, meant to reply to the list...)
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
> then you don't know how to code well in c. it may not be as
> nice as perl for some flow control things but goto is never
> needed in c either. i have seen it used and there are always
> better ways
On 11-04-14 12:52 PM, Brandon McCaig wrote:
I often use gotos in C for error handling within a function. If
you're allocating resources and something later on fails then you
usually want (or need) to clean up those resources before
returning. I've seen a lot of people duplicate the same cleanup
c
> "BM" == Brandon McCaig writes:
BM> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Uri Guttman
wrote:
>> then you don't know how to code well in c. it may not be as
>> nice as perl for some flow control things but goto is never
>> needed in c either. i have seen it used and there are always
>
On Apr 13, 4:07 pm, sono...@fannullone.us wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read somewhere that it's bad practice anymore to call a subroutine
> like this:
>
> &subroutine();
>
Normally yes but there are a few circumstances
where you need the sigil. See: perldoc perlsub
> I've also read wh
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
> goto just shouldn't be in your vocabulary. there is no reason for it at all
> in any decent language, especially perl.
I've been following this thread and I'm just curious. If goto is so
bad, why did they add it to Perl?
Marc
--
To un
On 11-04-14 01:47 PM, sono...@fannullone.us wrote:
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
goto just shouldn't be in your vocabulary. there is no reason for it at all in
any decent language, especially perl.
I've been following this thread and I'm just curious. If goto is s
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:05:54 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Uri and Peter,
>>
> Regarding the "Goto statement considered harmful" myth, see what I wrote
> about it here:
"Myth" is generally used to descibe something widely thought to be true
that is in fact false. The assertion that goto is ha
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:49:45 -0700, sono-io wrote:
> The only one I was concerned with was a sub called "if",
Sounds like a great device for an obfuscated Perl contest entry. That's
the only place I want to see it, though.
>but it
doesn't
> look like it's a built-in function. How
Hi Uri,
On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 17:47:02 Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "SF" == Shlomi Fish writes:
> SF> On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 09:15:35 Uri Guttman wrote:
> >> > "PS" == Peter Scott writes:
> PS> Here is the definitive explanation:
> >> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ PS> ewd02xx/
On 11-04-14 02:36 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 17:47:02 Uri Guttman wrote:
> then you don't know how to code well in c.
Thanks for the compliment.;-)
> it may not be as nice as perl
> for some flow control things but goto is never needed in c either.
Thanks for avoiding
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "BM" == Brandon McCaig writes:
> BM> I often use gotos in C for error handling within a function. If
> BM> you're allocating resources and something later on fails then you
> BM> usually want (or need) to clean up those resources befor
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:32:13AM +0800, guo-qijiang wrote:
> Hello, When I cross compile the Perl source(5.10.1) in linux.
Cross-compiling perl is not easy. I would suggest trying at least the
latest stable release, 5.12.3, and perhaps even the lastest version from
git, which is reasonably st
On 14/04/2011 19:36, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> I should note that in C "continue", "break", and a pre-mature "return" may
> also be considered as pseudo-gotos.
Indeed. Funtionally, Perl has many keywords that transfer control to a
different place in the code (next, break, continue, return, if, elsif
> "SF" == Shlomi Fish writes:
SF> Well, some use cases for goto in C:
SF> 1. Breaking out of more outer loop (as there is no "continue label;" or
"break
SF> label;" in C:
SF>
SF> for (i=0 ; i < len ; i++)
SF> {
SF> for (j = 0
SF> {
SF> if (func(i, j)
> "BM" == Brandon McCaig writes:
BM> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> that can still be done very cleanly without gotos. one technique is to
>> collect all the resources into a structure as you initialize. at any
>> point when it fails, you return to an outer f
At 13:39 +0300 12/04/2011, Shlomit Afgin wrote:
I need to write regular expression that will capitalize the first
letter of each word in the string.
Word should be word that her length is greater or equal to 3 letters
exclude the words 'and' and 'the'.
I tried:
$string = lc($string);
$string
At 23:00 +0300 14/04/2011, Shlomi Fish wrote:
In Perl, I don't encourage people using goto statements, and I did not find a
use for them in Perl, yet. But I don't rule out that they have legitimate use
in other languages...
int alloc_stuff(struct_t * * ref)
{
Let's stick to Perl and stop bo
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Brandon McCaig wrote:
> catch:
> // Cleanup all allocated resources and ignore unallocated
> // ones (that is, no matter where in the function the goto is
> // called it should work properly and not crash the
> // application)...
I forgot to mention th
Hi,
I need help in formatting ouput from system command, i could'nt figure out a
way to format output from system command. appreciate your help with this,
the details are below.
hlis3 is file with list of clients
hosta
hostb
hostc
hostd
The below program looks through each client and outputs t
> "s" == sono-io writes:
s> On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> goto just shouldn't be in your vocabulary. there is no reason for it at
all in any decent language, especially perl.
s>I've been following this thread and I'm just curious. If goto
s>is so bad,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:44:57 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
> [ Good arguments about goto ]
> A final note, perldoc perlsyn says
>
> A loop's LABEL is not actually a valid target for a goto; it's just
> the name of the loop.
>
> and I am left wondering what this means, as I have had no problem
> wri
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:47:17 -0700, sono-io wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
>> goto just shouldn't be in your vocabulary. there is no reason for it at
>> all in any decent language, especially perl.
>
> I've been following this thread and I'm just curious. If g
I agree completely with you, clean code is the best documentation.
But in your snippet I have to say: The use of $& anywhere in a program
imposes a considerable performance penalty on all regular expression
matches.
it would be better to avoid default/magic variables. I would consider
this snippe
Hi,
I need help in formatting ouput from system command, i could'nt figure out a
way to format output from system command. appreciate your help with this,
the details are below.
hlis3 is file with list of clients
hosta
hostb
hostc
hostd
The below program looks through each client and outputs t
31 matches
Mail list logo
