Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Curt Shaffer
> URI> still no warnings and strict. USE THEM. > > do it now. add them and declare all your variables. it will save your > ass. > I am running -w when I run the code. > > URI> what is the \ doing there. it makes the space into a space. it is not > seen by split or the regex engine. This is t

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Curt Shaffer
#!/usr/bin/perl use warnings; use strict; my $hping; my $hping_compare; my @hping_array = (); for (1 .. 5){ $hping = `sudo hping3 www.microsoft.com -S -p 80 -c 1`; push @hping_array,(split'\ ',$hping)[15]; } $hping_compare = $hping_array[0]; foreach (@hping_array){ if ($_ le $h

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Steve Bertrand
Curt Shaffer wrote: > #!/usr/bin/perl > use warnings; > use strict; > my $hping; > my $hping_compare; > my @hping_array = (); > > > for (1 .. 5){ > > $hping = `sudo hping3 www.microsoft.com -S -p 80 -c 1`; > push @hping_array,(split'\ ',$hping)[15]; > } > $hping_compare = $hping_

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Steve Bertrand
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Curt Shaffer wrote: >> #!/usr/bin/perl >> use warnings; >> use strict; >> my $hping; >> my $hping_compare; >> my @hping_array = (); >> >> >> for (1 .. 5){ >> >> $hping = `sudo hping3 www.microsoft.com -S -p 80 -c 1`; >> push @hping_array,(split'\ ',$hping)[15

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Curt Shaffer
>> SB> # ignoring the fact that you were advised to use named variables >> # instead of $_ where possible, here is one way to do it: I do not see how I can get away from using $_ because each iteration through the loop will be a different variable and thus a different array element. This is why

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Steve Bertrand
Uri Guttman wrote: > CS> foreach (@hping_array){ > > foreach my $ping ( @hping_array){ Uri showed right above how to avoid using $_. eg instead of: foreach ( @hping_array ) { $_ + 10; #...60 lines of code print "$_\n"; } do: for my $ping_result ( @hping_array ) {

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Curt Shaffer
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > Uri Guttman wrote: > >> CS> foreach (@hping_array){ >> >> foreach my $ping ( @hping_array){ > > Uri showed right above how to avoid using $_. eg instead of: > I didn't read/understand that fully as to the problem at hand. I apologize. >

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Uri Guttman
> "CS" == Curt Shaffer writes: URI> still no warnings and strict. USE THEM. >> >> do it now. add them and declare all your variables. it will save your >> ass. >> CS> I am running -w when I run the code. >> URI> what is the \ doing there. it makes the space into a space.

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Uri Guttman
> "CS" == Curt Shaffer writes: CS> #!/usr/bin/perl CS> use warnings; CS> use strict; CS> my $hping; CS> my $hping_compare; CS> my @hping_array = (); no need for the = () as all arrays are created empty. CS> for (1 .. 5){ CS> $hping = `sudo hping3 www.microsoft.com -

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Curt Shaffer
> > > Uri> no need for the = () as all arrays are created empty. I wasn't sure if strict would bark or not, so I figured better safe than sorry. > > Uri> someone told you that le is wrong for numeric comparison. and WHAT do > you think is in $_ there? you never explicitly set it. it may have so

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Curt Shaffer
> > > > Uri> post the output line from that command. do not let your emailer mung it > or word wrap it. show the part you want to extract out. there may be > easier ways to get it with a regex and not with split. I think you may be right. I would like to pull the numerics out from the id= sec

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Steve Bertrand
Curt Shaffer wrote: >> >> >> Uri> post the output line from that command. do not let your emailer mung it >> or word wrap it. show the part you want to extract out. there may be >> easier ways to get it with a regex and not with split. > > I think you may be right. I would like to pull the numeric

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Uri Guttman
> "CS" == Curt Shaffer writes: Uri> post the output line from that command. do not let your emailer mung it >> or word wrap it. show the part you want to extract out. there may be >> easier ways to get it with a regex and not with split. CS> I think you may be right. I would like to

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Uri Guttman
> "CS" == Curt Shaffer writes: >> >> Uri> no need for the = () as all arrays are created empty. CS> I wasn't sure if strict would bark or not, so I figured better safe than sorry. >> Uri> someone told you that le is wrong for numeric comparison. and WHAT do >> you think is

Re: sequential value check

2010-02-09 Thread Uri Guttman
> "SB" == Steve Bertrand writes: SB> $ping_result =~ m{ .* id=(\d+) }xms; that will match 'grid=123' or 'foo=34 noid=123' etc. the .* is allowing anything before the id. it may work here as no field other than id ends in 'id' but it is a poor regex. don't use *. unless you mean to grab so

Re: prepare(SELECT ... FROM TABLE) error

2010-02-09 Thread Jay Savage
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Tony Esposito wrote: > This question has never been answered.  To out it another way, given the code > ... > >  foreach my $mytable (@mytables) { >  my $sth = $dbh->prepare("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM mytable"); >  # report error but move on to next table > } > > how do