On Friday 14 December 2007 19:01, jeff pang wrote:
>
> --- "John W.Krahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > No, you would have to do:
> >
> > if ( !system($touchcmd) && !system($chkstat) )
>
> I have thought that, if the unix command's author doesn't return a 0
> from the code, how will we get the
On Dec 15, 2007 2:50 AM, John W. Krahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
> > $ cat test.c
> > #include
> >
> > main () {
>
> In C the main function returns an int so that is not compliant with the
> C standard[3]. It should be:
>
> int main ( void ) {
>
> > printf("hello world");
snip
That dep
On Saturday 15 December 2007 06:17, Chas. Owens wrote:
>
> On Dec 15, 2007 2:50 AM, John W. Krahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > $ cat test.c
> > > #include
> > >
> > > main () {
> >
> > In C the main function returns an int so that is not compliant with
> > the C standard[3]. It should be:
>
On Dec 15, 2007 12:22 PM, John W. Krahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
> > That depends on the version of C you are using. Given the lack of
> > other syntax in this short program I cannot tell if it is K&R C, ANSI
> > C, or C99. If he is using K&R C, that is a perfectly fine main
> > definition
