Re: use warnings; and #!/usr/bin/perl -w

2002-11-26 Thread david
Mystik Gotan wrote: > No. Use warnings is a module, the -w flag is just some extra for error > trapping (which sometimes really is useful!). But it's alright using both > (along with strict, ofcourse). So -w is a built in 'function' and > warnings.pm is just a module. > > (BTW, using the -T flag

Re: use warnings; and #!/usr/bin/perl -w

2002-11-26 Thread Chris Ball
>> On 26 Nov 2002 09:57:44, Dylan Boudreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Is use warnings; the same as #!/usr/bin/perl -w Good question. They're similar, but 'use warnings': - only works under Perl 5.6+ - works _lexically_, rather than globally - this means that you can do this: pack

Re: use warnings; and #!/usr/bin/perl -w

2002-11-26 Thread Mystik Gotan
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: use warnings; and #!/usr/bin/perl -w Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:57:44 -0400 Is use warnings; the same as #!/usr/bin/perl -w Dylan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

RE: use warnings; and #!/usr/bin/perl -w

2002-11-26 Thread wiggins
No. use warnings is file scoped. -w is 'executable' scoped. In other words any modules that you 'use' will inherit the -w but not the 'use'. At least that is my understanding from the Camel. And appears to be the case from what I have seen in action. http://danconia.org --

use warnings; and #!/usr/bin/perl -w

2002-11-26 Thread Dylan Boudreau
Is use warnings; the same as #!/usr/bin/perl -w Dylan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]