On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 09:20 , Jenda Krynicky wrote:
No flame war intended...
[..]
> Anyway ... to sum this all up I'd say:
>
> 1) If you are not sure you know whadaheck package means ...
>don't use it in your code.
> 2) If you introduce another package in a script
> Unless someone can come up with a really HOT idea as to why
> one would want to put a 'package declaration' in an
> application - and I have tried, but for the life of me, can
> not come up with a good reason to go there...
How about as a mnemonic device, or to sort variables by category?
Co
From: drieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 07:27 , Jenda Krynicky wrote:
>
> > From: drieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [..]
> >> if the package assertion makes sense here
> >> then this should be a Module
> >>hence start with h2xs
> >
> > Well ... imagine
Jenda,
On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 07:27 , Jenda Krynicky wrote:
> From: drieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Unless someone can come up with a really HOT idea as to why one
>> would want to put a 'package declaration' in an application -
[..]
>> if the package assertion makes sen
On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 07:27 , Jenda Krynicky wrote:
> From: drieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[..]
>> if the package assertion makes sense here
>> then this should be a Module
>>hence start with h2xs
>
> Well ... imagine you need some custom class of objects in your
>
From: drieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Unless someone can come up with a really HOT idea as to why one
> would want to put a 'package declaration' in an application - and I
> have tried, but for the life of me, can not come up with a good reason
> to go there... the simple rule of th
volks,
I think we need to address Gary Hawkin's questions about the package
'function'
beyond the obligatory cf. perldoc -f package - and folks SHOULD check it
out.
it gives the simple introduction to doing 'name space management' -
one of the reasons that 'lexical scoping' is IMPORTANT
