te the program.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: a b [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 5:01 AM
> To: beginners@perl.org
> Subject: survive with exec
>
> Hello ,
>
> i want to execute some batch/perl file from my perl program and co
code,
because it will only indicate whether or not the shell was able to
execute the program.
-Original Message-
From: a b [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 5:01 AM
To: beginners@perl.org
Subject: survive with exec
Hello ,
i want to execute some batch/perl file fr
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >a.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >b.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >c.txt");
and,I'm a little strange here. if your first 'exec' is executed
successfully,the main script process should be replaced with the exec call.In
other words,the executing of 'wperl hang.pl >a.txt' shoul
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >a.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >b.txt");
>exec ("wperl hang.pl >c.txt");
>
hi,
here I think you could fork the childs,and call the 'exec' in childs,it should
be good for your purpose.
for example,
for (my $i=0;$i<3;$i++){
my $child = fork();die "can't fork $!" unless
a b wrote:
Here i want to execute one and then execute another but don't wait for
previous command i.e.something in background but im unable to do it.
see:
perldoc -q 'How do I start a process in the background?'
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Hello ,
i want to execute some batch/perl file from my perl program and continue to
do some changes and then re-execute some files.
my code is like
st.pl
-
exec ("wperl hang.pl >a.txt");
exec ("wperl hang.pl >b.txt");
exec ("wperl hang.pl >c.txt");
hang.pl
-
#!/usr/b
