John McKown wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
Sounds pretty good to me. One concern, do the sub record types always
have the same number of fields? Using your array to unpack into may
turn into a maintenance nightmare with respect to indexing into it to
get values if the recor
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
>
> Sounds pretty good to me. One concern, do the sub record types always
> have the same number of fields? Using your array to unpack into may
> turn into a maintenance nightmare with respect to indexing into it to
> get values if the record formats
> I have an input file which has many subrecords. The subrecord type is
> denoted by the first 4 characters of the file. The rest of the line is
> formatted like similar to the way that "pack" would format one. That is,
> each data point in a subtype is always at the same offset for the same
>
I have an input file which has many subrecords. The subrecord type is
denoted by the first 4 characters of the file. The rest of the line is
formatted like similar to the way that "pack" would format one. That is,
each data point in a subtype is always at the same offset for the same
length. E.
