well thanks for the explanation..
I asked because we saw pointer in my last C class (buy the way I hate
ANSI C).. and was wondering, when sending an array of let's say 6
strings, if it would be faster to send the adress of this array, kind of
like we do in C by using pointers.
Then the sub can m
--- Etienne Marcotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a very newbie question..
>
> When sending arguments to a sub, is it preferable to send a pointer to
> this value or the value itself. Or after x arguments it's better to send
> references?
>
> Etienne
Etienne,
I think Brett W. McCoy gav
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Etienne Marcotte wrote:
> When sending arguments to a sub, is it preferable to send a pointer to
> this value or the value itself. Or after x arguments it's better to send
> references?
It all depends on what the function is doing. For complex data
structures, references ar
This is a very newbie question..
When sending arguments to a sub, is it preferable to send a pointer to
this value or the value itself. Or after x arguments it's better to send
references?
Etienne
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]