Rob Dixon wrote:
On 07/12/2010 04:07, Harry Putnam wrote:
Is there any way to reduce the amount of decimals math might be
carried too short of printf?
I always find printf to end up taking a fair bit of time, since I've
forgotten most of what I ever knew about it each time I run into a
need fo
On 07/12/2010 04:07, Harry Putnam wrote:
Is there any way to reduce the amount of decimals math might be
carried too short of printf?
I always find printf to end up taking a fair bit of time, since I've
forgotten most of what I ever knew about it each time I run into a
need for it.
I just wond
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:07:17 -0600
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Is there any way to reduce the amount of decimals math might be
> carried too short of printf?
>
> I always find printf to end up taking a fair bit of time, since I've
> forgotten most of what I ever knew about it each time I run into a
>
Is there any way to reduce the amount of decimals math might be
carried too short of printf?
I always find printf to end up taking a fair bit of time, since I've
forgotten most of what I ever knew about it each time I run into a
need for it.
I just wondered if there is any other kind of limiting
