peter grotz wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Why don´t use $dbh as a global? Now in this way it works for me at this
time!
In general using globals in this way is considered bad form. It is
considered bad form because as the number of lines, modules, etc. grows
in the program it becomes harder and harder to
Hi,
first, thanks fro your answer!
Wiggins d Anconia schrieb:
[...]
Your 'dbh' is lexically scoped, which means it goes out of view at the
end of the file, therefore it will not be available for use in your
subroutine. Using either 'our' or 'use vars' will fix the symptom, see
below for more a
> Hello,
>
> I have a main prog and some subs in different files.
> At runtime I use "require ´pathtofile/´;" to include these files to the
> main prog as subs. In the main prog I´m using the modul HandySQL3 with a
> databasehandle let´s say
>
> /snip/
> ##main prog ##
use strict;
use warnings
Hello,
I have a main prog and some subs in different files.
At runtime I use "require ´pathtofile/´;" to include these files to the
main prog as subs. In the main prog I´m using the modul HandySQL3 with a
databasehandle let´s say
/snip/
##main prog ##
require ´./sub.pl´;
use HandySQL3;
my $dbh
