From:Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jenda wrote:
> > From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> It makes more sense to me that (,) is kind of the same thing as
> >> saying (@a,@b). In list context @a returns the array as a list, but in
> >> scalar context @a returns the number of elements
> From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Bryan R Harris wrote:
John W. Krahn wrote:
>
> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>
>> John W. Krahn wrote:
>>>
>>> The left hand side of the assignment determines context so the @l2r{...}
>>> part.
>>
>> That st
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Bryan R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>>
>>> John W. Krahn wrote:
Bryan R Harris wrote:
>
> John W. Krahn wrote:
>>
>> The left hand side of the assignment determines context so the @l2r{...}
>> part.
>>>
From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Bryan R Harris wrote:
> >>
> >> John W. Krahn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>
> John W. Krahn wrote:
> >
> > The left hand side of the assignment determines context so the @l2r{...}
> > part.
>
> That strik
> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>
>> John W. Krahn wrote:
>>>
>>> Bryan R Harris wrote:
John W. Krahn wrote:
>
> The left hand side of the assignment determines context so the @l2r{...}
> part.
That strikes me as odd... When perl goes to populate @l2r{"a","b"}, it
>>
Bryan R Harris wrote:
John W. Krahn wrote:
Bryan R Harris wrote:
John W. Krahn wrote:
The left hand side of the assignment determines context so the @l2r{...}
part.
That strikes me as odd... When perl goes to populate @l2r{"a","b"}, it
seems to me that it would go through this process:
> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>
>> John W. Krahn wrote:
>>>
>>> Bryan R Harris wrote:
> Jenda Krynicky wrote:
>
> Context. The returns a single line in scalar context and
> a list of all lines in a list context. And there is no such thing as
> a two-item-list context.
Bryan R Harris wrote:
John W. Krahn wrote:
Bryan R Harris wrote:
Jenda Krynicky wrote:
Context. The returns a single line in scalar context and
a list of all lines in a list context. And there is no such thing as
a two-item-list context.
So in the first case the assignment to @l2r{"a","b
> Bryan R Harris wrote:
>>> From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Given an open filehandle, why don't these two things do the same thing?
**
@l2r{"a","b"} = (, );
$c = ;
**
$l2r{"a"
Bryan R Harris wrote:
From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Given an open filehandle, why don't these two things do the same thing?
**
@l2r{"a","b"} = (, );
$c = ;
**
$l2r{"a"} = ;
$l2r{"b"} = ;
$c = ;
> From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Given an open filehandle, why don't these two things do the same thing?
>>
>> **
>> @l2r{"a","b"} = (, );
>> $c = ;
>>
>> **
>> $l2r{"a"} = ;
>> $l2r{"b"} = ;
>> $c = ;
>>
>> **
From: Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Given an open filehandle, why don't these two things do the same thing?
>
> **
> @l2r{"a","b"} = (, );
> $c = ;
>
> **
> $l2r{"a"} = ;
> $l2r{"b"} = ;
> $c = ;
>
> *
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Bryan R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Given an open filehandle, why don't these two things do the same thing?
>
> **
> @l2r{"a","b"} = (, );
> $c = ;
>
because @l2r{...} is a list, right?
so the statement above is in a
Given an open filehandle, why don't these two things do the same thing?
**
@l2r{"a","b"} = (, );
$c = ;
**
$l2r{"a"} = ;
$l2r{"b"} = ;
$c = ;
**
The first seems to be slurping the whole
14 matches
Mail list logo
