Since "perldoc" and related code is written in perl, you can use a debugger to
debug it. You can do:
perl -d `which perldoc` -f sort
See:
* http://perl-begin.org/topics/debugging/
Thank you very much, Shlomi!!
I debugged perldoc as you suggested and found the error. Basi
Hi Pablo!
See below for my response.
On Sat, 23 May 2015 03:10:18 -0300
Pablo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Something really odd is happening to me. For example, if I do `perldoc
> -v $_` I get the information about $_ as expected, but whenever I try
> `perldoc -f sort` I get this me
Hi.
Something really odd is happening to me. For example, if I do `perldoc
-v $_` I get the information about $_ as expected, but whenever I try
`perldoc -f sort` I get this message:
/No documentation for perl function 'sort' found./
It seems that perldoc doesn't find a
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:35:17 -0500, Peter Holsberg wrote:
>Peter Gordon wrote:
>>>On 11/18/2013 10:45 AM, Juan Wei wrote:
>>
>>>I have the Cywin version of perl installed on a Windows 7
>>>computer, and it does not have a perldoc executable.
>>>
>&
Peter Gordon wrote:
>>On 11/18/2013 10:45 AM, Juan Wei wrote:
>
>> I have the Cywin version of perl installed on a Windows 7
>> computer, and it does not have a perldoc executable.
>>
>> How can I get perldoc functionality?
>>
>Open a bash window &
>On 11/18/2013 10:45 AM, Juan Wei wrote:
> I have the Cywin version of perl installed on a Windows 7
> computer, and it does not have a perldoc executable.
>
> How can I get perldoc functionality?
>
Open a bash window & type perldoc -h
This should give you the documentatio
Hi Juan, see below:
On 11/18/2013 10:45 AM, Juan Wei wrote:
Michael,
Please send questions to the list. I'm not a private support channel and
you will likely find more help faster there.
I have the Cywin version of perl installed on a Windows 7 computer, and
it does not have a pe
nt $str;
>> }
>>
>> # here I want to put POD that describes this function
> [...]
>
> Of course you can; that's almost exactly how most POD is written.
>
> Look at nearly any half-decent module on CPAN, or see perldoc perlpod -
> it even has examples.
almost exactly how most POD is written.
Look at nearly any half-decent module on CPAN, or see perldoc perlpod -
it even has examples.
They key is that =cut ends POD, and POD directives restart it.
e.g.
=head1 NAME
Badger
=head1 SYNOPSIS
my $badger = Badger->new;
if ($b
back to Perl with =cut.
If the intent is only to have the documentation for the
subroutines right above them so they're nearby and easier to keep
in sync then I think that the Pod format will work just fine. :)
If you haven't already then you should read through `perldoc
p
I'm looking at documenting perl code I'm working on. I'm considering POD but I
don't
think it can do what I want. Example of what I would like...
[code]
# here I would put POD synopsis etc.
# here I want to put POD that describes this function
sub my_echo
{
my ($str)
Andy Bach hat am 17. August 2012 um 22:12 geschrieben:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Andy Bach wrote:
> > So try starting the test script w/.:
> > use Rex;
> > use Rex::Commands::Iptables;
>
> Nope - sort of the other way round, 'rex' is an executable program
> that, like perl, you use t
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Andy Bach wrote:
> So try starting the test script w/.:
> use Rex;
> use Rex::Commands::Iptables;
Nope - sort of the other way round, 'rex' is an executable program
that, like perl, you use to run your script. It normally processes a
file in the current dir call R
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dominik Danter wrote:
> Wow, that was fast; thank you!
> I did define it - here is the code that produced the output:
> #!/usr/bin/env perl
>
> use Rex::Commands::Iptables;
Oh, well, that wasn't in the snippet. 'task' is actually in Rex, not
Rex::Commands::Iptabl
oo {
my ($arg1, $sub) = @_;
print "Called foo with these arguments: @_\n";
# Calling the subroutine via reference.
$sub->($arg1);
}
sub named_sub {
print "Called named_sub with these arguments: @_\n";
}
See perldoc perlsub.
Regards,
--
Brandon McCai
Andy Bach hat am 17. August 2012 um 20:25 geschrieben:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Andy Bach wrote:
> > Well, 'task' isn't a Perl function built-in or core module
>
> Whoops - dang gmail hides the subject line on me -
> http://search.cpan.org/~jfried/Rex-0.31.3/lib/Rex/Commands/Iptab
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Andy Bach wrote:
> Well, 'task' isn't a Perl function built-in or core module
Whoops - dang gmail hides the subject line on me -
http://search.cpan.org/~jfried/Rex-0.31.3/lib/Rex/Commands/Iptables.pm
you left off the line:
use Rex::Commands::Iptables;
The module
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Dominik Danter wrote:
> String found where operator expected at ./test.pl line 5, near "task
> "firewall""
Well, 'task' isn't a Perl function built-in or core module so ...
can't find anything that uses that syntax for some kind of
multitasking/fork/parallel (PO
Hi,
I don't understand the following code:
task "firewall", sub {
iptables_clear;
...
...
};
I have searched for "perl task" and have not found anything meaningful. Copy
pasting the snippet and executing result in the following:
1286 % ./test.pl
String found whe
On 12-02-10 11:26 AM, casandra riera ribas wrote:
Hi, I have some (probably very stupid) problem when trying to search in perldoc
in my computer (MacOSX 10.7.2), see:
I would say that your Perl documentation is missing. On Linux, some
distros come without it. I know how to load it in Debian
Hi, I have some (probably very stupid) problem when trying to search in perldoc
in my computer (MacOSX 10.7.2), see:
maccasandra:~ mcasandrariera$ perldoc perltoc
No documentation found for "perltoc".
maccasandra:~ mcasandrariera$ perldoc List::Util ##this worked
maccasandra:~ mcas
On 5 February 2012 03:29, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
>
>
> Author says:
>
> Adding and removing rows
> To create a new record in the database, you can use the create method. It
> returns an instance of My::Schema::Result::Album that can be used to access
> the data in the new record:
>
> my $new_album
Author says:
Adding and removing rows
To create a new record in the database, you can use the create method. It
returns an instance of My::Schema::Result::Album that can be used to access the
data in the new record:
my $new_album = $schema->resultset('Album')->create({ title => 'Wish You Were
Heh, yes, that trips me too.
> The details are in
>
> perldoc perlre
>
That's not all there is there. And the "BUGS" section reads:
[QUOTE]
This document varies from difficult to understand to completely and
utterly opaque. The wandering prose riddled with jargon is h
My memory always fails me regarding the result of a Perl pattern match.
It depends on
- m// or s///
- scalar or list context
- /g qualifier
... and I am not certain that that is all!
The details are in
perldoc perlre
but my question is whether the list thinks a more ordered document would
be
Download it with both HTML and PDF files:
http://perldoc.perl.org/perldoc.tar.gz
> Message du 27/06/11 23:42
> De : "Peng Yu"
> A : "Perl Beginners"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Links to perldoc in pdf
>
> Hi,
>
> perldoc.perl.org has the perl docum
Hi,
perldoc.perl.org has the perl document in pdf format. But I don't find
a webpage that links to all the pdfs. I only find webpage that links
to htmls. Does anybody know if there is a webpage that has links to
all the pdf document?
perldoc.perl.org/perlintro.pdf
--
Regards,
Peng
--
To unsub
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 13:54, Gabor Szabo wrote:
snip
> There is the new perlopref document by Chas. Owens who is also on
> this list. That's great. Thanks Chas! That will be able to explain
> certain expressions such as &&.
>
> I am sure he will be happy to get some help from you.
> See http:
perldoc has all sorts of problems, it is hard to use to people who
don't yet know how to use it and it does not give you a useful
answer to many questions.
It gives you a correct answer, it is just not very useful to beginners.
tryperldoc -f open
It has a long explanation on all kin
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:14:41 +1000, Noah Garrett Wallach
wrote:
Hi there,
Hello
does anybody know why the perldoc output looks so strange on my mac?
Here are the first few lines of 'perldoc perldoc'
I have no idea on the strange output but on my linux box some characters
At 7:34 PM -0700 9/4/09, Noah Garrett Wallach wrote:
Hi there,
this might be obvious but how can I find a list of all the perldoc modules?
Perldoc will only work for modules that are installed on your system.
The directories in which Perl will search for modules is given by the
array @INC
2009/9/5 Noah Garrett Wallach :
> Hi there,
>
> this might be obvious but how can I find a list of all the perldoc modules?
>
All standard modules including core and non-core modules have perldoc interface.
For checking core modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~rgarcia/Module-CoreL
Hi there,
this might be obvious but how can I find a list of all the perldoc modules?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
Hi there,
does anybody know why the perldoc output looks so strange on my mac?
Here are the first few lines of 'perldoc perldoc'
SYNOPSIS
perldoc [###7m<88><92>^H###7m<88><92>h]
[###7m<88><92>^H###7m<88><92>v] [###7m<88>
> "Thomas" == Thomas Bätzler writes:
Thomas> Now $class is 'Dormouse', but the current package is 'Mouse' and the
Thomas> explanation from perlboot makes sense: $class->SUPER::speak() invokes
Thomas> Animal::speak() and not Mouse::speak().
Exactly, because if it didn't, it'd be an infinite l
Dave Tang asked:
> I've been going through perldoc perlboot and I have a question about
> using the SUPER class. Here's the code in the documentation:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> use strict;
> use warnings;
>
> {
> package Animal;
> sub speak {
&g
Hello,
I've been going through perldoc perlboot and I have a question about using
the SUPER class. Here's the code in the documentation:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
{
package Animal;
sub speak {
my $class = shift;
print "a $class goes ",
> "asmith9983" == asmith9983 writes:
asmith9983> I've found the site:-
asmith9983> [redacted]
asmith9983> very useful for things I've worked on for examples.
Sir, I'm personally offended by you. The authors of the materials you've just
posted an indirect link for worked hard to produce th
Dermot wrote:
>2009/4/8 Richard Hobson :
>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:50 -0400, "Chas. Owens"
>> wrote:
> Amazon US has "Intermediate Perl" new for $25,
>> while Amazon UK has it for $46, excluding postage.
>
>
>It's £30.99 and postage is free if you accept standard 2nd class delivery.
30.99 GBP in
2009/4/8 Richard Hobson :
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:50 -0400, "Chas. Owens"
> wrote:
Amazon US has "Intermediate Perl" new for $25,
> while Amazon UK has it for $46, excluding postage.
It's £30.99 and postage is free if you accept standard 2nd class delivery.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Intermediat
t;, but I've heard that
> "Programming Perl" is the best next step.
> But, what's the advantage of "Programming Perl" when we have
"perldoc"?
> What does the book give me that perldoc does not?
A chess program sounds ambitious for a first program in
in particular
that you are getting hung up on?
I thought about getting "Intermediate Perl", but I've heard that
"Programming Perl" is the best next step.
I'd disagree and say that your suggestion of Intermediate Perl would be
the next best step.
But, what's the
One other thing: http://perldoc.perl.org/ is an excellent way to read the
docs online (searchable too), and it provides pdf versions of almost
everything.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
On Wed Apr 08 2009 @ 1:08, Richard Hobson wrote:
> But, what's the advantage of "Programming Perl" when we have "perldoc"?
> What does the book give me that perldoc does not?
One thing that nobody has mentioned is that Programming Perl hasn't been
updated
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 08:57, Richard Hobson wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:50 -0400, "Chas. Owens"
> wrote:
>> Your whois information suggests that you live in the US; I am always
>> amazed to hear fellow Americans say things like "that book is
>> expensive." We have a wonderful lending librar
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:50 -0400, "Chas. Owens"
wrote:
> Your whois information suggests that you live in the US; I am always
> amazed to hear fellow Americans say things like "that book is
> expensive." We have a wonderful lending library system in this
> country, use it. If your local library d
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:08:41 +0100, Richard Hobson wrote:
> But, what's the advantage of "Programming Perl" when we have "perldoc"?
> What does the book give me that perldoc does not?
In earlier editions, the only difference was footnotes. Later editions
have mor
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 08:42, Richard Hobson wrote:
snip
> OK. I'll probably stick with perldoc and get "Intermediate Perl". I'm
> currently unemployed, so I can't really fork out for both books right
> now - but I have plenty of time to learn Perl!
snip
Your w
e and say that your suggestion of Intermediate Perl would be
>> the next best step.
>>
>> A book. Some descriptions are more in depth and having a book with a
>> table of contents and index can often be easier to reference when you
>> don't know *where* to look in per
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 08:37, Brian J. Miller wrote:
snip
>> I thought about getting "Intermediate Perl", but I've heard that
>> "Programming Perl" is the best next step.
>>
>
> I'd disagree and say that your suggestion of Intermediate Perl would be
> the next best step.
snip
I would say both are
easier to reference when you
> don't know *where* to look in perldoc, but much of the information will
> be the same. (Any number of sites and Google can help with where to
> look.)
OK. I'll probably stick with perldoc and get "Intermediate Perl". I'm
currently u
easier to reference when you
> don't know *where* to look in perldoc, but much of the information will
> be the same. (Any number of sites and Google can help with where to
> look.)
OK. I'll probably stick with perldoc and get "Intermediate Perl". I'm
currently u
something in particular
that you are getting hung up on?
> I thought about getting "Intermediate Perl", but I've heard that
> "Programming Perl" is the best next step.
>
I'd disagree and say that your suggestion of Intermediate Perl would be
the next best st
Programming Perl" is the best next step.
But, what's the advantage of "Programming Perl" when we have "perldoc"?
What does the book give me that perldoc does not?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
Snider wrote:
I'm experiencing a strange problem with perldoc on a RHEL 4 box.
Basically, I get no output when I run perldoc as a regular
user. In other words, I get a blank less output. If I run the
command as root I can see the information. I'm kind of stumped as to
how to
I'm experiencing a strange problem with perldoc on a RHEL 4 box.
Basically, I get no output when I run perldoc as a regular
user. In other words, I get a blank less output. If I run the
command as root I can see the information. I'm kind of stumped as to
how to debug this problem.
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 17:17 -0700, oryann9 wrote:
> So in general in a web environment with 8-12gb RAM,
> mod_Perl and a MySQL/Postgres backend, do you or
> people you know statically link libc.a?
My understanding is with mod_perl the perl is constantly loaded into
Apache, not starting and stopp
ant
> > > to do one or the
> > > other, you should probably pick up a good book
> on C
> > > and/or the C
> > > compiler on your system.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > -- jay
> >
> >
> > thank you for respon
e C
> compiler on your system.
>
> HTH,
>
> -- jay
thank you for responding, however I have to disagree
with you in that this is not a Perl question because
it is, otherwise perldoc -q would not have this info.
In addition it directly talks about options when
installing Perl.
I th
On 3/22/07, oryann9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
So in general in a web environment with 8-12gb RAM,
mod_Perl and a MySQL/Postgres backend, do you or
people you know statically link libc.a?
For mod_perl performance related questions I would suggest asking on
the mod_perl list ([EMAIL PROTECT
> -- jay
thank you for responding, however I have to disagree
with you in that this is not a Perl question because
it is, otherwise perldoc -q would not have this info.
In addition it directly talks about options when
installing Perl.
So in general in a web environment with 8-12gb RAM,
mod_Perl a
On 3/22/07, oryann9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/22/07, oryann9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snip
> > Am I linked to libc.a?
> snip
> >libc=/usr/lib/libc.a, so=dll, useshrplib=true,
> libperl=libperl.a
> snip
>
> It looks like it. My perl says
--- Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/22/07, oryann9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snip
> > Am I linked to libc.a?
> snip
> >libc=/usr/lib/libc.a, so=dll, useshrplib=true,
> libperl=libperl.a
> snip
>
> It looks like it. My perl says
> libc=/lib/libc-2.4.so, so=so, useshrplib=t
On 3/22/07, oryann9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
Am I linked to libc.a?
snip
libc=/usr/lib/libc.a, so=dll, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.a
snip
It looks like it. My perl says
libc=/lib/libc-2.4.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8
it looks like you are using Acti
On this FAQ I read:
If you're currently linking your perl executable to a
shared libc.so, you can often gain a 10-25%
performance benefit by rebuilding it to
link with a static libc.a instead. This will make a
bigger perl exe-cutable, but your Perl programs (and
programmers) may thank you for it.
On 3/3/07, Jay Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
perldoc -f doesn't return anything
for a number of functions
Is this normal behavior?
Nope. This sounds like a job for perlbug.
Cheers!
--Tom Phoenix
Stonehenge Perl Training
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I just noticed something strange with my perldoc (v5.8.6 built for
darwin-thread-multi-2level): some perldoc -f doesn't return anything
for a number of functions, particularly, it seems, a number of the
functions for SCALRs and strings. I noticied it first with chr, but
none of the func
> never read or heard before. Also surprising is how detailed it is,
> > you
> > wand and chant some special words and magically out pops some thing
> > you wave a
> > "perldoc" to me has always been this kind of magicians hat where
> >
> &g
On 1 nov 2006, at 23.03, Bryan R Harris wrote:
"perldoc" to me has always been this kind of magicians hat where
you wave a
wand and chant some special words and magically out pops some thing
you
never read or heard before. Also surprising is how detailed it is,
it seem
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:02 -0700, Bryan R Harris wrote:
> > On 11/1/06, Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> "perldoc" to me has always been this kind of magicians hat where you
> >> wave a wand and chant some special words and magica
On 11/2/06, Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is there a way to get perldoc to dump *everything* it knows
into a huge text file?
In addition to the core Perl documentation, which is a large set of
pod files, nearly all modules have their own documentation files
(usually with .
> On 11/1/06, Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "perldoc" to me has always been this kind of magicians hat where you
>> wave a wand and chant some special words and magically out pops
>> some thing you never read or heard before.
>
>&g
On 11/1/06, Bryan R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"perldoc" to me has always been this kind of magicians hat where you
wave a wand and chant some special words and magically out pops
some thing you never read or heard before.
Is it possible to somehow pipe the whole t
"perldoc" to me has always been this kind of magicians hat where you wave a
wand and chant some special words and magically out pops some thing you
never read or heard before. Also surprising is how detailed it is, it seems
to have things that even the Perl Bookshelf doesn't.
Is
using). Chances are that the thing that annoys
you has already been taken care of.
As Tom said, perlbug is one of the most promising ways to go - it
already takes care of including your version info into the bug report.
I found that you meant
perldoc -q filehandle
and the problem is
Tom Phoenix wrote:
On 8/24/06, Klaus Jantzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to inform whoever feels responsible for perldoc
You may use the perlbug program to send bug reports for Perl, its
utilities, and its documentation. Send a patch, if you can.
output of
perl
On 8/24/06, Klaus Jantzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to inform whoever feels responsible for perldoc
You may use the perlbug program to send bug reports for Perl, its
utilities, and its documentation. Send a patch, if you can.
output of
perldoc -f filehandle
I would like to inform whoever feels responsible for perldoc that the
output of
perldoc -f filehandle
contains a small typo.
Before anybody says "it does not work" here the the info:
Line 85 should say "$fh = IO::Handle -> new();" i.e. the dash of the
arrow is
On Oct 19, Randy W. Sims said:
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
On Oct 19, Brian Volk said:
Is there a perldoc that will list the available arguments and there
meanings
for perl-one-liners?
Yes. To try and figure out what perldoc to look at for a given topic, do:
perldoc perldoc
Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
On Oct 19, Brian Volk said:
Is there a perldoc that will list the available arguments and there
meanings
for perl-one-liners?
Yes. To try and figure out what perldoc to look at for a given topic, do:
perldoc perldoc
You mean `perldoc perl` ?
On Oct 19, Brian Volk said:
Is there a perldoc that will list the available arguments and there meanings
for perl-one-liners?
Yes. To try and figure out what perldoc to look at for a given topic, do:
perldoc perldoc
which will show the names of the documentation sections and a brief
Brian Volk wrote:
> Hi All~
Hello,
> Is there a perldoc that will list the available arguments and there meanings
> for perl-one-liners?
perldoc perlrun
> I saw this in an earlier email; Subject: Delete a char from a file
>
>Perl -pi -e '/s/%/
Hi All~
Is there a perldoc that will list the available arguments and there meanings
for perl-one-liners?
I saw this in an earlier email; Subject: Delete a char from a file
Perl -pi -e '/s/%/ /' filename
I'm guessing the -i is for in-place edi
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Charles K. Clarkson wrote:
> Octavian Rasnita <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : "perldoc" is a program included in the perl package.
> :
> : Just run the commands:
> :
> : perldoc perldoc
> : perldoc perl
>
> Y
Octavian Rasnita <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: "perldoc" is a program included in the perl package.
:
: Just run the commands:
:
: perldoc perldoc
: perldoc perl
You can run the commands from a dos (or command prompt) window
on a Windows type machine.
: And you
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm really new to PERL, and have what's probably a really basic
question
I've seen references to "perldoc" where apparently a person can look and
find explanations of various PERL topics...but where do I go to find
PERLDOC? Is this
I'm really new to PERL, and have what's probably a really basic
question
I've seen references to "perldoc" where apparently a person can look and
find explanations of various PERL topics...but where do I go to find
PERLDOC? Is this
a website or ???
Thank you
Ok basically I have written a module, and it works, I have updated the
documentation in the module, and it works for the most part. What I am seeing
is that when I use a single quote that the line looks like this when you use
perldoc.
ookup::GetInfo(’$affiliate’,’$ip_address’,’
ubject: where to get perldoc Net::Telnet? missing in the perldoc from
perldoc.perl.org
> Hi,
> I do not have the Net::Telnet in the perldoc i
> downloaded from perldoc.perl.org. even
> http://perldoccom/cspan/Net/Telnet.Html page is not
&g
Hi,
I do not have the Net::Telnet in the perldoc i
downloaded from perldoc.perl.org. even
http://perldoccom/cspan/Net/Telnet.Html page is not
working
meena
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http
Thanks Jenda ! Got it now =)
- Original Message -
From: "Jenda Krynicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: Which perldoc discuss about loops ?
> From: "Bee" <[EMAIL PROTEC
From: "Bee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just a quick question, which perldoc talking about loops ?
> for, while, do until... ? I just can't find it out
perlsyn
Jenda
= [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz =
When it comes to wine, women an
Hi,
Just a quick question, which perldoc talking about loops ?
for, while, do until... ? I just can't find it out
TIA,
Bee
Ken Wolcott wrote:
A fishing pole question rather than a fish question :-)
What search string do I use on google or perldoc so that I know how to
display a specified range of lines from a file (like sed -n 24, 48p
filename)?
Zeus gave you the solution, but the background is explained in perldoc
The following prints lines 24-48 of filename:
prompt> perl -ne "print if 24..48" filename
"Ken Wolcott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> A fishing pole question rather than a fish question :-)
>
> What search string do I use on g
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:32:09 +0200, Jenda Krynicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Ken Wolcott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What search string do I use on google or perldoc so that I know how to
> > display a specified range of lines from a file (like sed -n 24, 4
From: Ken Wolcott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What search string do I use on google or perldoc so that I know how to
> display a specified range of lines from a file (like sed -n 24, 48p
> filename)?
Whatever you like. I doubt you'll find anything.
> s2p no longer operates t
A fishing pole question rather than a fish question :-)
What search string do I use on google or perldoc so that I know how to
display a specified range of lines from a file (like sed -n 24, 48p
filename)?
s2p no longer operates the way I used to use it back in perl 3x days :-)
man s2p really
I've been noticing for a while now. I keep forgetting to
ask about it since it only comes up if I copy/paste something from the
output of perldoc.
Here is an example of what I see:
perldoc -f split
Now from that output, find the first example of actual scripting
(scroll down to find it)
Brian Volk wrote:
Hi All,
which perldoc (s) should I read if I'm going to be writing a program using
regular expression? Substitutions - case shifting.
I have a folder which contains thousands of text files. (short desc. for
image files). I copied and pasted most of the short descriptio
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
