Re: perl dd

2011-04-02 Thread Peter Scott
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:51:58 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > 2. The problem with 1E9 is that I think it's a floating point number > (though Perl 5 may have some intelligence there). Not sure it matterns a > lot for Perl but if you do something like 1.27E9 you may get weird > side-effects due to: Yup,

Re: perl dd

2011-04-01 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Thursday 31 Mar 2011 16:54:14 Peter Scott wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:07:41 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > Also, Larry Wall has allowed Perl 5 numeric constants to contain > > underscore so you can write 10**9 as 1_000_000_000 instead of 10 > > which is much less readable and also mor

Re: perl dd

2011-03-31 Thread Peter Scott
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:07:41 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Also, Larry Wall has allowed Perl 5 numeric constants to contain > underscore so you can write 10**9 as 1_000_000_000 instead of 10 > which is much less readable and also more error-prone. (Larry Wall)++ . 1E9 seems to capture your i

Re: perl dd

2011-03-31 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Uri, On Thursday 31 Mar 2011 01:19:15 Uri Guttman wrote: > > "O" == Owen writes: > O> This will generate 1 files in less than a second. They are 0 size, > O> so just write something into them if you don't wont zero sized files > > might as well clean this up. > > O> #!/usr/bin

Re: perl dd

2011-03-30 Thread Uri Guttman
> "JWK" == John W Krahn writes: JWK> Uri Guttman wrote: >> foreach my $i ( 1 .. 1 ) { JWK> ITYM: JWK> foreach my $i ( 1 .. ) { yes. and i also did 1 .. 9 later on. numerical typos is my excuse. uri -- Uri Guttman -- u...@stemsystems.com http://www.

Re: perl dd

2011-03-30 Thread John W. Krahn
Uri Guttman wrote: "O" == Owen writes: O> This will generate 1 files in less than a second. They are 0 size, O> so just write something into them if you don't wont zero sized files might as well clean this up. O> #!/usr/bin/perl O> use strict; O> my $file = "/some/whe

Re: perl dd

2011-03-30 Thread Uri Guttman
> "O" == Owen writes: O> This will generate 1 files in less than a second. They are 0 size, O> so just write something into them if you don't wont zero sized files might as well clean this up. O> #!/usr/bin/perl O> use strict; O> my $file = "/some/where/writeable/a1"; O> m

Re: perl dd

2011-03-30 Thread Owen
> Thanks all!! > > Can someone tell me if you have any experience in generating files > quickly(not sparse) in unix? > > I want to generate millions of files under some directory > This will generate 1 files in less than a second. They are 0 size, so just write something into them if you don't

Re: perl dd

2011-03-30 Thread a b
Thanks all!! Can someone tell me if you have any experience in generating files quickly(not sparse) in unix? I want to generate millions of files under some directory Thanks in Advance! On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Filip Sneppe wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, a b wrote:

Re: perl dd

2011-03-29 Thread Filip Sneppe
Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, a b wrote: > Hey Chas, > > Thanks much for your reply. I actually want to have some more control over > this. > > Thinking in way to initiate some in parallel also to get rid of ""OS"" > specific things [if there] > dd is really pretty limited if you want to u

Re: perl dd

2011-03-29 Thread a b
Hey Chas, Thanks much for your reply. I actually want to have some more control over this. Thinking in way to initiate some in parallel also to get rid of ""OS"" specific things [if there] thought of minimizing effort to run something which you suggested below. But seems like, the only option in

Re: perl dd

2011-03-28 Thread Chas. Owens
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:22, a b wrote: > Thanks Rob > > I too was thinking that way. Just in case if any one might have face this > issue and hence this email > > Well if no module i will live with it for time being snip The Unix dd command is a swiss army knife of copying data, could you narr

Re: perl dd

2011-03-28 Thread a b
Thanks Rob I too was thinking that way. Just in case if any one might have face this issue and hence this email Well if no module i will live with it for time being Regards, a b On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Rob Coops wrote: > I had a quick look but I can only see people making system call

Re: perl dd

2011-03-28 Thread Rob Coops
I had a quick look but I can only see people making system calls using system() or exec() etc... which sort of makes sense as there is no such command on pretty much any system except for *nix systems. I think you might simply have to write your own implementation or simply rely on system calls to

Re: perl dd

2011-03-28 Thread a b
Hey Rob, Yes, you are right Thanks to mention this out. I was referring to unix dd command. was wondering if we have any module already available. i didn't found on cpan Thx a b On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Rob Coops wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:18 AM, a b wrote: > >> Hi, >>

Re: perl dd

2011-03-28 Thread Rob Coops
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:18 AM, a b wrote: > Hi, > > I want to know if any module for "dd" in perl is available. > > Any pointers will a great help > > Thanks, > a b > Have you tried having a look at search.cpan.org? Oh, by the way what does dd stand for? Acronyms are great and all but unless

perl dd

2011-03-28 Thread a b
Hi, I want to know if any module for "dd" in perl is available. Any pointers will a great help Thanks, a b