- Original Message -
>I think spamd can run on seperate box, maybe it is easier/quicker to setup
>fresh SA on fresh box than fixing the broken perl on the production email
>server.
It can. But I'm a firm believer in fixing things properly. My setup has a
two stage anti-spam setup, the ext
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
- Original Message -
Life really sucks. At least it sounds like it is a personal or
development machine rather than a production system.
I wish... It's my gateway email server. I've bypassed all anti-spam/perl
functions to keep it running whi
- Original Message -
>Life really sucks. At least it sounds like it is a personal or
>development machine rather than a production system.
I wish... It's my gateway email server. I've bypassed all anti-spam/perl
functions to keep it running while I figure out what to do.
- Original Message -
>Because, if I remember correctly, mod_perl will still be broken.
>Unless he is willing to recompile it as well then he will have a
>problem with it. The docs seem to support my memory:
Yes I am, in fact it was one of the first steps I took to fix the problem.
Contrar
On 5/8/07, Kevin W. Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
>Short answer: You have RHEL, put in a support call.
Right. And paid support...
Ah, bad assumption on my part.
>Medium answer: We cannot tell you much without know how you tried to
>install perl 5.8.8. RPM fr
On 5/8/07, Vincent Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
Why don't you get rid of all current perl and perl libraries and build
from tarball source, then run the new installed cpan command to install
modules that SA depends on
snip
Because, if I remember correctly, mod_perl will still be broken.
U
- Original Message -
>Short answer: You have RHEL, put in a support call.
Right. And paid support...
>Medium answer: We cannot tell you much without know how you tried to
>install perl 5.8.8. RPM from a later version of RHEL? Compiled from
>source?
Used rpm -e to erase current install.
- Original Message -
>Actually, you don't need to upgrade to 5.8.8 if you don't need the new
>feature which latest SpamAssassin introduced to allow SA rules written in
>multi-bytes languages. Add "use bytes" back to Mail::SpamAssassin::Message
>will skip the broken SARE rules warnings. To
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
I run SpamAssassin on a RHEL 4 box with the FuzzyOCR plugin. This
combonation was sending errors to my log files so often that my server
slowed down. Follow up on the cause revealed an upgrade to 5.8.8 would
correct the problem.
Actually, you don't nee
On 5/8/07, Kevin W. Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
Then I installed perl 5.8.8 and re-installed my modules that I use.
snip
So, now I don't have a mod_perl for apache and my spamassassin won't run
because of some strange perl error.
snip
Short answer: You have RHEL, put in a support ca
I run SpamAssassin on a RHEL 4 box with the FuzzyOCR plugin. This
combonation was sending errors to my log files so often that my server
slowed down. Follow up on the cause revealed an upgrade to 5.8.8 would
correct the problem.
Unfortuantly I've spent a few days cleaning up the aftermath of the
p
11 matches
Mail list logo
