Re: package verification

2001-06-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
Got this question forwarded on to me. Hope the talk of .t files doesn't go over everyone's heads. On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:40:06AM -0500, Me wrote: > > I'm writing a package that uses another module. This latter module may > > change somewhat erratically and unreliably, outside of my control.

Re: package verification

2001-06-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:17:50PM -0400, Richard J. Barbalace wrote: > Trying to do this gives a warning. For example: > package MyPackage; > use Flakey; > . > package MyPackage::A; > . > package MyPackage::C; > # Test if Flakey is compatible with MyPa

Re: package verification

2001-06-26 Thread Richard J. Barbalace
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:13:18PM -0400, Richard J. Barbalace wrote: > > > I'm writing a package that uses another module. This latter module may > > change somewhat erratically and unreliably, outside of my control. As > > a result, I want to have the package test itself and die if it notic

Re: package verification

2001-06-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:13:18PM -0400, Richard J. Barbalace wrote: > I'm writing a package that uses another module. This latter module may > change somewhat erratically and unreliably, outside of my control. As > a result, I want to have the package test itself and die if it notices > that t

package verification

2001-06-26 Thread Richard J. Barbalace
Hi. I'm writing a package that uses another module. This latter module may change somewhat erratically and unreliably, outside of my control. As a result, I want to have the package test itself and die if it notices that the other module has changed in an incompatible way. What's a good way of