On Jun 5, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
>
> Honestly, it's really not even that complicated. I've been hearing that
> using CGI.pm is 'outdated', 'uncool', whatever you want to call it. And
> generally speaking the statement after that is about mod_perl.
>
> My entire reason behind aski
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:37:33AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 09:25 PM, pangj wrote:
> >
> >>I want to understand why Mark thinks he needs mod_perl. If it's just
> >>because he wants to speed up his app (soup up the engine) there might
> >>be things he can do that don't require rewrit
On 06/04/2012 09:25 PM, pangj wrote:
I want to understand why Mark thinks he needs mod_perl. If it's just
because he wants to speed up his app (soup up the engine) there might
be things he can do that don't require rewriting a lot of code, or
spending a lot of time learning a lot of new ways of
I want to understand why Mark thinks he needs mod_perl. If it's just because he
wants to speed up his app (soup up the engine) there might be things he can do
that don't require rewriting a lot of code, or spending a lot of time learning
a lot of new ways of doing things.
Me second.
If the
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Chris Nehren wrote:
>>
>> Well, from all I've read and been told is that mod_perl is a better
>> fit than using CGI.pm like I've been doing.
>
> Erg. CGI.pm is a terrible idea--runtime string eval and all that
> silliness.
Well, again, I disagree with that. This cam
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:36:21 -0400 , Mark Haney wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 09:57 AM, Chris Nehren wrote:
>
> >
> >Erg. CGI.pm is a terrible idea--runtime string eval and all that
> >silliness. Please investigate one of the lighter Plack/PSGI frameworks
> >like Dancer and Web::Simple. Really, mod_p
On 06/04/2012 09:57 AM, Chris Nehren wrote:
Erg. CGI.pm is a terrible idea--runtime string eval and all that
silliness. Please investigate one of the lighter Plack/PSGI frameworks
like Dancer and Web::Simple. Really, mod_perl is the wrong tool for the
job here. It's for writing Apache modules w
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:42:43 -0400 , Mark Haney wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 07:30 PM, Chris Nehren wrote:
>
> >Don't, unless you're writing Apache modules in Perl. There are much
> >better choices for doing web dev in Perl, like Catalyst, Dancer,
> >Web::Simple, etc., which all use Plack/PSGI. Thes
On 06/03/2012 07:30 PM, Chris Nehren wrote:
Don't, unless you're writing Apache modules in Perl. There are much
better choices for doing web dev in Perl, like Catalyst, Dancer,
Web::Simple, etc., which all use Plack/PSGI. These can all be deployed
on any web server.
Well, from all I've read a
There are some books listed there:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/offsite/books.html#Books_mentioning_mod_perl
Also you may want to join the modperl mailing list, that's an active
list with many MP developers there.
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
Regards.
What is the best book/tu
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 17:35:05 -0400 , Mark Haney wrote:
> What is the best book/tutorial/site/documentation out there to get
> someone up to speed on mod_perl? I've looked around including the
> apache site and I've put together bits and pieces, but I certainly
> don't think I'm getting the who
What is the best book/tutorial/site/documentation out there to get
someone up to speed on mod_perl? I've looked around including the
apache site and I've put together bits and pieces, but I certainly don't
think I'm getting the whole story. Best practices and so on. Money
isn't an object, so
12 matches
Mail list logo
