Re: coding standards question and RFC

drieux wrote: So in classical Trinitarianism it is: Phase I: Master Yourself Stay independent. Phase II: Collect Underlings Kill all the robots. Phase III: Global Domination!!! Enjoy peace. :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: coding standards question and RFC

On Apr 21, 2004, at 4:16 AM, Michael C. Davis wrote: [..] Thanks for the insights, drieux. While I wish I were in a position to establish corporate policy, I'm not, and my objective is merely to satisfy myself that I have a reasoned, workable approach. Your feedback helps a lot. Coming up with a '

Re: coding standards question and RFC

At 06:23 PM 4/19/04 -0700, drieux wrote: >The problem then becomes, and I can not tell from >your email - if you are in the position to be setting >'corporate policy' - Which is the Real Issue here. Thanks for the insights, drieux. While I wish I were in a position to establish corporate policy,

Re: coding standards question and RFC

On Apr 19, 2004, at 9:06 AM, Michael C. Davis wrote: [..] I realize it's hard to read without formatting, so here's a copy of the same document, with formatting for readability: http://www.knology.net/~mcdavis941/codingstandards.html Thanks very much in advance for any feedback. [..] Props for th

coding standards question and RFC

Hi list, Having worked with Perl for a while now, it looks like Perl is going to be part of my life for some time to come. So, it's time to get formal about coding standards and practices. First on the list is deciding how to name things. One standard shows up frequently (camelBack for method