From: "Rob Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes. A the semicolon is a statement separator in Perl. Unlike C,
> where it is a statement terminator and the final semicolon is
> required. Null statements are also allowed, so
>
> ( return 99; }
>
> is the same as
>
> { return 99 }
>
> or
>
> { r
John W. Krahn wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Does the semicolon behave any differently for a return test statement?
> >
> > Example,
> >
> > sub validate
> > { return shift =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9][\w-]*\.[a-zA-z]+$/ }
> >
> > or
> >
> > sub validate
> > { return shift =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9][\w-]*\.[a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does the semicolon behave any differently for a return test statement?
>
> Example,
>
> sub validate
> { return shift =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9][\w-]*\.[a-zA-z]+$/ }
>
> or
>
> sub validate
> { return shift =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9][\w-]*\.[a-zA-z]+$/; }
Trailing commas and semicol
I don't know, does it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: behavior of semicolon on return line
Does the semicolon behave any differently for a return test statement?
Example,
Does the semicolon behave any differently for a return test statement?
Example,
sub validate
{ return shift =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9][\w-]*\.[a-zA-z]+$/ }
or
sub validate
{ return shift =~ /^[a-zA-Z0-9][\w-]*\.[a-zA-z]+$/; }
thanks
-
eMail solutions by
http://
